|
|
 | | Re: Worst of the worst
|
| Agreed! (but not spotlighted!) I just went through announce.moc and highlit a few items, maybe we can push the unpleasentness off the front page. (19 years ago, 16-Aug-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Worst of the worst
|
| (...) Agreed. As a new member with high expectations from this most "friendliest" of locales, I would like to let you all know that viewed from "the outside"(i.e. folks with little or no Lugnet experience) this type of garbage does not speak well of (...) (19 years ago, 16-Aug-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Worst of the worst
|
| (...) No, I think you're wrong and users need a way to counter spotlighting in cases like this. Your post is another example of why a post needs an option to downgrade it. Some people who agree with you have gone and highlighted it. Now it looks (...) (19 years ago, 16-Aug-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Worst of the worst
|
| (...) If people now highlight your post they are saying they agree with you rather than Richie. Thus his system would work. With a negative spotlight you allow people to treat things negatively without giving a valid alternative which is needlesly (...) (19 years ago, 16-Aug-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Worst of the worst
|
| (...) No, you misunderstand. You spotlight stuff you want to see spotlighted. Spotlight a post of a MOC that you like, or an event you're interested in. You don't have to spotlight a "counter view". If you don't want my post appearing in the (...) (19 years ago, 16-Aug-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
|
