To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 13590
13589  |  13591
Subject: 
Re: Announcing the new LUGNET Link List
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:50:47 GMT
Viewed: 
6507 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Rene Hoffmeister wrote:
As for LEGOFan.org: it is in fact an official site, but I wouldn't mind to
see it in both cats.

Maybe it's changed, but I believe LegoFan.org is not *really* an official site.
As I recall, LegoFan was a site that had the official "approval", and had
limited sponsorship/endorsement from the company. However, the actual site was
always supposed to be run by fans, so that the company wouldn't have to allocate
any dedicated resources to the project. Essentially, they didn't want to be
*responsible* for the site, so asked fans to do the job for them.

Hence, LegoFan was able to do as it pleased, but Lego holds *very* substantial
amount of weight over the site by offering it:

- Use of "Lego" in the domain
- Links from Lego.com (not sure if this ever happened? was certainly in the
original goals)
- Exclusive updates and Lego announcements that other sites don't get (or don't
get as primarily)
- Funding (this was always iffy, and hadn't happened last I knew, but was slated
to happen "someday, as warranted, maybe")

So, LegoFan was sort of leashed in those regards by the company. Fortunately,
I'm not aware of any differences in opinion between the site and the company
that ever forced the issue. I think the company and the site administration were
pretty much always on the same page anyway.

DaveE



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Announcing the new LUGNET Link List
 
(...) [...] (...) I agree. However, though I doubt it was ever a point of disagreement, I believe the company insisted there be no discussion of clone brands on the site. And I'm fairly sure they didn't want negative coverage of the product there (...) (18 years ago, 28-Jun-06, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Announcing the new LUGNET Link List
 
(...) Um... I think general discussion sites are also a kind of LUG? As for LEGOFan.org: it is in fact an official site, but I wouldn't mind to see it in both cats. Leg Godt, Rene (18 years ago, 28-Jun-06, to lugnet.admin.general)

29 Messages in This Thread:













Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR