 | | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
--SNIP-- (...) .trains is still missing Thanks for all the painfully tedious work it must be restoring this. Tim (19 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
(...) Hrm... ok, whoops, missed otd. Restoring now, should be back soon. Let us know if any other missing areas are discovered. --Todd (19 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
(...) Any updates worth mentioning? I ask because I'm concerned that people will be denied access to my years of profound wisdom as archived in ot.debate. Dave! (19 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
(...) Thanks, Tim. We are aware of the problem and will restore data. -Suz (19 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
"Dan Boger" <dan@peeron.com> wrote in message news:20060124171103....ron.com... (...) What? No redundant RAID array??? (19 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
