To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 12602
12601  |  12603
Subject: 
Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Wed, 13 Apr 2005 18:34:40 GMT
Highlighted: 
(details)
Viewed: 
308 times
  
Hey,

Just wanted to second the idea of excluding unreviewed posts from making the highlight lists. A couple of times recently I have posted MOCs and then been pleasantly surprised to see them on the highlight list the next time I went to Lugnet. But then I reallized it was only because noone seems to highlight anything, and so the most recent posts to announce.moc go onto the list by default.

Of course, the answer is for every regular poster to Lugnet to highlight one thing daily, or even weekly. I think that there is a small handfull of people who use the highlight feature, and that’s pretty much it. I know that every few weeks I get on a highlighting kick, and make a real effort to flag everything cool I see. Then my fervor dies down and I don’t use the feature again for a couple of weeks.

One possible programming solution would be for the spot/highlights to have a longer lifetime. I don’t know how long it takes for something to fall off the list. Obviously you don’t want some really cool MOC to get a bunch of spotlights and then stay on the list for the next year until something else gets more. If that were true new stuff would never get on the list and it would be filled with the coolest work by our best builders (or, sadly, all color debates, but let’s assume for the argument that people are highlighting cool creations rather than the debates). But perhaps old spot/highlights, rather than going away altogether, would just decrease in weighting. That way, even if no one has spotlighted today, something that got three spotlights last week wouldn’t be displaced by my new posting to announce.moc that hasn’t been reviewed by anyone yet.

Oh, on the other issue, I hadn’t noticed it until now, but that randomizing of Brickshelf galleries is really annoying. It does seem that it is only scrambling the order of the 24 galleries on a given “recent” page, rather than bumping something from position 1 to the next page, so it’s not totally unmanageable, but it is annoying.

Bruce



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
 
(...) I find it especially bothersome when there has been one or two new additions and the page gets shuffled. The one or two additions get lost in all of the "old" thumbnails. It creates the illusion among the uninitiated that there is a lot of new (...) (19 years ago, 13-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)

2 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR