| |
In lugnet.admin.general, Joseph Greene wrote:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Rob Antonishen wrote:
> > On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 16:24:07 GMT, Joe Greene <white_volg@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > <OPINION>
> > > Posting the link to the personal assault here, constitutes flying his kite in
> > > both places. The assault, meaning the contest, was unconscionable. Posting
> > > reference to the assault on this system was equally so.
> > > </OPINION>
> >
> >
> > Just to clarify, it was Lenny, in
> > http://news.lugnet.com/org/ca/rtltoronto/?n=13560 that posted the link
> > here in lugnet, not Chris.
> >
> > -Rob A>
>
> Ok, then I tender my apologies to Chris regarding the posting on Lugnet of the
> link to the contest.
Well done Joseph. Seriously. Thank you.
This new information brings up an interesting twist and question, but first I
will adamntly say that what Chris did was wrong, in any forum.
If Chris did the contest completely outside of lugnet, and a third party brings
it to lugnet, is it really *just* to "revoke his right to post indefinitely?" I
don't think so, *if* that was the primary reason for his "time out".
Kevin
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
47 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
