Subject:
|
Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 1 Mar 2005 20:56:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
983 times
|
| |
|
|
Paul Sinasohn wrote:
> IMHO,
>
> It would take a huge amount of processing power to analyze the text of every
> single post. THat's why human brains do it here, not computers.
umm... I think you underestimate just how fast the lugnet server
hardware is and that the posts are already indexed to be searchable.
This url (which has been sanitized) found all occourances of one
of 7 dirty words in 0.2 seconds. To get them all would take negligable
time and effort .
try it yourself : )
http://news.lugnet.com/?q=fsck
things like spaces, etc can easily be filtered with a regex.
-JSM
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
|
| (...) A chat site that my wife used to use had a similar profanity replacement program, it replaced the words with amusing alternative that sometime gave a clue to the original word. However, with a bit of testing it was obvious that: A: There were (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
