| | Re: New Group Suggestions
|
|
(...) never be (...) I'm (...) I've been in contact with a few people trying to come up with a similar group. I wouldn't go with simply lugnet.parts. What about: lugnet.parts for talking about existing elements or new elelments produced by Lego (...) (20 years ago, 22-Apr-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
| | Requesting to cancel posts
|
|
"James Stacey" <james@minifig.co.uk> wrote in message news:HwIw7t.EL6@lugnet.com... (...) We can't move posts, however, we can administratively cancel posts if you make a clear request to do so. A URL link to the post with a clear request like: (...) (20 years ago, 21-Apr-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
| | Re: oops sorry
|
|
not my day is it, just posted this (URL) to .announce not announce.moc .... grrr (20 years ago, 21-Apr-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
| | oops sorry
|
|
just posted this to .announce not .announce.moc sorry dunno if you can move the group. That'd be groovy ta (20 years ago, 21-Apr-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
| | Re: Pictures in posts
|
|
(...) Read about it below. Remember, you need to select "Formatted text (FTX)" when you post for it to work. (URL) is a little secret when including Brickshelf images in posts. You can post thumbnails that have automatically been generated by (...) (20 years ago, 21-Apr-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
| | Pictures in posts
|
|
How do you put pictures in a post? ~Clangador (20 years ago, 21-Apr-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
| | Re: Two ways you can help LUGNET ...
|
|
(...) Bugzilla is great, but I'm not sure it'd be the best for external use -- its UI isn't terribly intuitive. Once you're over the initial intimidation, it's very powerful, but if you're just an end-user, it shouldn't be that complicated to (...) (20 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
| | Re: Password Question
|
|
(...) Currently, you should send an email to Todd. Work is underway to change that, I believe. (20 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
| | Re: REPLY BACK
|
|
(...) You'll hear no disagreement from me. I guess I just don't see the value add (given that there are no other lists that this is done for). (20 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
| | Re: REPLY BACK
|
|
(...) LUGNET has a better mechanism for "subscribe as mailing list." Why keep this anachronistic exception around, gatewaying to an outside mailing list? If that list can't control its spam then I suggest LUGNET should pull the plug on the gateway, (...) (20 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|