 | | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
|
(...) Which part of the community, specifically? General LEGO fans? Webmasters of other LEGO-related fan web sites? (...) Why? Although I have been vocal in my opinion that Lugnet is not the perfect LEGO hub site, since it deals with a subset of (...) (21 years ago, 16-Feb-04, to lugnet.org, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general) !
|
| |
| | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
|
(...) Caling people profane names, and posting curse words and baiting others is not something that is looked kindly upon here on Lugnet - you may want to keep this in mind in the future. It is also not in the spirit of what we are here for. Posted (...) (21 years ago, 16-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
|
(...) It is. (...) As little as possible. We want to make the content accessible in as many different ways as possible, but preferably using existing protocols like NNTP, SMTP and NNTP. (...) You sound like a Jacob clone. :-) But it could be fun to (...) (21 years ago, 15-Feb-04, to lugnet.org, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
|
(...) I think any standards compliant browser should work for the website, oh, and IE. We do want to implement an NNTP interface as well as an SMTP, for as much content as possible. My personal philosophy is that javascript can be used only to (...) (21 years ago, 15-Feb-04, to lugnet.org, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general) !
|
| |
| | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
|
(...) That sounds like mostly server-side stuff. Have you figured out yet what you are going to require from clients (users)? The reason I ask is that I'm an old-fashioned soul, and am unlikely to use discussion groups that are not NNTP-reachable, (...) (21 years ago, 15-Feb-04, to lugnet.org, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
|
(...) Dan will start throwing heavy stuff across the Atlantic, if I claim it is vapor-ware at the moment, but it is at least not in a usable state yet. Basically (and possibly not quite correctly) it is a content management system with access (...) (21 years ago, 15-Feb-04, to lugnet.org, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
|
[ adding .general, .admin.general, follow-up to .admin.general ] (...) Actually: I've been worried about this for a very long time, ever since back when I was worried that this fancy new Lugnet thing would kill RTL. [*] So, I've asked Todd for (...) (21 years ago, 12-Feb-04, to lugnet.org, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
|
(...) [Okay, but leaving .general and putting in .admin.general] (...) Which I'm a big fan of. What software, and how far along is it? (...) Also good! [snip] (...) So, sounds like you intend to duplicate a lot of the functionality of Lugnet. Have (...) (21 years ago, 12-Feb-04, to lugnet.org, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
|
(...) Have you considered switching to something like kagi.com? I haven't used them as a supplier, but I have as a customer, and I've gotten automated stuff from there before. And they seem to suck less than Paypal. (21 years ago, 12-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
|
(...) Zing! "Well played" as Sandlin would say. (...) D'Oh! Tom, are you still left hanging? As far as I'm aware, all the pending applications are processed up through I think Tuesday (two days ago). Of course, I may be unaware (ignorant!) of (...) (21 years ago, 12-Feb-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
|
(...) In what ways do we not have that forum with Lugnet? Although I use the NNTP interface, I find the web interface to be one of the best of any www-discussion forum out there. *Especially* when it comes to threads. [followup-to .general and (...) (21 years ago, 12-Feb-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Attachments?
|
|
"Fredrik Glöckner" <fredrigl@math.uio.no> wrote in message news:m3r7x26052.fsf@...ydomain... (...) In Outlook it looks like an attachment, and it shows it in the end of the message as a little smiley picture. (esmile.gif) /Joakim (21 years ago, 11-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Attachments?
|
|
As far as I can see, the article you're refering do does not have an attachement in the MIME sense of the word. Rather, it just has some binary uuencoded "garbage" added to the end of the message. Your client may be trying to help you by (...) (21 years ago, 10-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Attachments?
|
|
"Jocke" <terje029SPAMBLOCK@xpress.se> wrote in message news:HspKnI.1xqv@lugnet.com... (...) Is this group dead? =) /J (21 years ago, 10-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Quatro newsgroup, but no Racers newsgroup?
|
|
I don't think racers really belong in Duplo ;) seriously tho (and don't quote me here) but the policy tends to be product lines get a discussion group as a matter of course Quatro isn't Duplo, it isn't Primo it is an entirely new system. The policy (...) (21 years ago, 9-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Quatro newsgroup, but no Racers newsgroup?
|
|
(...) I think you're using the words "ridiculous" and "seriously wrong" a little lightly.... (21 years ago, 7-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Quatro newsgroup, but no Racers newsgroup?
|
|
So Quatro got its newsgroup, but RACERS still doesn't? This is ridiculous. Why not put it under Duplo? Something is seriously wrong here. When I asked for a Racers newsgroup, many people agreed. Racers is a much more popular theme among adults than (...) (21 years ago, 7-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Attachments?
|
|
Odd.. I have never seen attachments in messages before? (URL) use Outlook to read Lugnet) Is something broken on the server or is it possible to post attachments nowadays? /Joakim (21 years ago, 7-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | PASSWORD RESET x2
|
|
Sorry to have to ask, but I lost all my cookies - can I have a new passowrd e-mailed to me please. I need to update my set lists as people want to buy things that I don't have for sale anymore! (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: DNS outage, service restored
|
|
(...) Hey, this same thing just happened to the Washington Post, so I guess Todd's in good company here. See (URL) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
