Subject:
|
Re: Digests
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 22 Feb 1999 19:46:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
830 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, blisses@worldnet.att.net (Steve Bliss) writes:
> Are the >'s a simple count of depth, or are they (more like)
> logarithmic?
Just a simple count of the number of message-id's in the References header.
> Cool feature, either way.
Unfortunately, it's not smart enough to detect when someone has been bad and
has deleted the References header (by accidentally starting a new thread when
they really wanted to follow up directly to a message).
--Todd
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Digests
|
| On Mon, 22 Feb 1999 09:30:51 GMT, lehman@javanet.com (Todd Lehman) wrote: [Really excellent write-up snipped] (...) Are the >'s a simple count of depth, or are they (more like) logarithmic? Cool feature, either way. Steve (25 years ago, 22-Feb-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
