Subject:
|
Re: Use of lugnet.castle.org
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 11 Feb 2002 03:04:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3173 times
|
| |
|
|
Mr L F Braun wrote:
> An outsider's viewpoint on .castle.org: I looked at it as a smaller
> "in-group," much like .pirates (which suffers a large percentage of
> mildly off-topic or questionable posts, perhaps), or .loc.au/.org.au,
> and so I didn't really see it as a problem. If a significant portion
> of the membership has an issue with that and demands enforcement of
> topic faithfulness, then that's different. How OT were some of these
> posts in question?
Well, most of the misplaced posts are castle-world, which has it's own
group (I'd also prefer to not see the castle-world posts in
lugnet.castle, or at least the IOM ones). I'd prefer to go to
lugnet.castle.org.cw to see all of the castle-world stuff in one place.
There's also an occasional "look at my new castle" post there.
> I agree. This post will be XFUT -> .admin.general.
Oops, sorry for not FUTing to lugnet.admin.general in the first place...
> > <snip>
> >
> > > lugnet.trains.org has some discussion which really belongs in
> > > lugnet.trains. Keep lugnet.trains.org for discussion of new groups, and
> > > announcement of shows, and announcement of picture galleries from shows
> > > and the like (though the picture galleries should be cross-posted to
> > > lugnet.trains with follow-ups set there). Of course that's my own
> > > selfish desires...
> >
> > Send me a few links off line that illustrate this one will you? I'm AOK with
> > being a bit stronger on that particular point in that particular hierarchy...
I can't think of any specifics right now. It's just been something I've
noticed and got mentioned since I got motivated to post based on the
lugnet.castle.org postings...
Frank
|
|
1 Message in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
