 | | Re: Market posts and TOS (was Re: Black Cat 5571 + 5563 + 5561) —Tim Courtney
|
| | | (...) I second this wholeheartedly. (...) Too bad its taken this long. It should have been changed a while ago. -Tim (23 years ago, 14-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Market posts and TOS (was Re: Black Cat 5571 + 5563 + 5561) —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | This is a pretty good example of how telling people where to post stuff doesn't do much good. I don't know Ronan myself, but I think he has been around for quite some time. The People listing shows that he has been a lugnet member since 23-Nov-2000. (...) (23 years ago, 14-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Market posts and TOS (was Re: Black Cat 5571 + 5563 + 5561) —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | (...) This is too bad. If he's been following LUGNET for this long, he does [most likely] know better. This is exactly the attitude we DON'T need on LUGNET - people flaunting the charters and disrespecting other groups for their financial gain. (...) (23 years ago, 14-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Market posts and TOS —Ronan Webb
|
| | | | Hi all I think I need to reply to this with more than "sorry". My first thought was that two words ought to suffice. But where's the proportion in all of this ? Yes, I've posted to the .market tree before, BUT have never really digested that (...) (23 years ago, 14-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Market posts and TOS —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | <rwebb@enohspamaltavista.net> wrote in message news:Gpxx64.3FL@lugnet.com... (...) for (...) Or perhaps lugnet.people-who-ac...ugnet-turn ing-into-usenet? At least that's what my post was. Taking the previous posts as a hypothetical situation and (...) (23 years ago, 14-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| | | | |
