 | | Re: Uselessness of .debate
|
| (...) Can the two of you please take all of this offline to private email? --Todd (26 years ago, 23-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Debate's current problem (was Re: Uselessness of .debate)
|
| (...) I read your other post, and you made some groovy assertions. I suppose I'm as guilty of "point-scoring" as anyone else, but I wasn't consciously doing it to amass points. Sometimes it seems to me simply polite to address each point in turn, (...) (26 years ago, 22-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Debate's current problem (was Re: Uselessness of .debate)
|
| Larry Pieniazek wrote in message ... (...) Well, Larry, surely you spend a lot more time reading these newsgroups than most, so perhaps only a few have ventured down to this part of the discussion tree. If you like, you could refer to the post in (...) (26 years ago, 21-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: i will hve an auction up soon on ebay
|
| For future use, *all* auction announcements are supposed to be in ".market.auction", and *not* in any of the "themed" directories. Franklin (26 years ago, 21-Dec-00, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Debate's current problem (was Re: Uselessness of .debate)
|
| In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek writes: <snip> Whoops. Forgot to trim lugnet.admin.general from followups, please, if you respond, do trim your followups even though I forgot to. ++Lar (26 years ago, 21-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
