 | | Re: wish's - Contest canceled
|
| (...) **snip** (...) Yeah, I thought the guidelines might have been spelled-out already but didn't know where. Now that I think of it, I remember that Larry answered my earlier question about timeout policy. But now that you mention it, I have a (...) (21 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: In support of Larry
|
| (...) I think most people know I'm not much of a "me too" guy. But sometimes, you just have to say, ME TOO! Larry's work has been dilegent and has profoundly contributed to our community. Larry's work in all the aspects of the community that he has (...) (21 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.people)
| | | | | In support of Larry
|
| I'm ashamed of all the Larry-bashing that's been taking place. If you've only interacted with the man online (which I believe is the case with some of his harshest critics), you have no perspective on who he really is. Hence, you're really not (...) (21 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.people) !
| | | | | Re: Lugnet should be MORE draconian
|
| (...) This hasn't been discussed on the list, and I'm sure there are probably a variety of opinions, but I'll offer mine. Overriding the FUT of an article alters the article's metadata item known as the "Followup-To" header. While this is not part (...) (21 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
|
| (...) Hmm. Can an admin veto his/her own suspension? ;) Scott A (21 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
