 | | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
|
(...) Have you considered switching to something like kagi.com? I haven't used them as a supplier, but I have as a customer, and I've gotten automated stuff from there before. And they seem to suck less than Paypal. (22 years ago, 12-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
|
(...) Zing! "Well played" as Sandlin would say. (...) D'Oh! Tom, are you still left hanging? As far as I'm aware, all the pending applications are processed up through I think Tuesday (two days ago). Of course, I may be unaware (ignorant!) of (...) (22 years ago, 12-Feb-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
|
(...) In what ways do we not have that forum with Lugnet? Although I use the NNTP interface, I find the web interface to be one of the best of any www-discussion forum out there. *Especially* when it comes to threads. [followup-to .general and (...) (22 years ago, 12-Feb-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Attachments?
|
|
"Fredrik Glöckner" <fredrigl@math.uio.no> wrote in message news:m3r7x26052.fsf@...ydomain... (...) In Outlook it looks like an attachment, and it shows it in the end of the message as a little smiley picture. (esmile.gif) /Joakim (22 years ago, 11-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Attachments?
|
|
As far as I can see, the article you're refering do does not have an attachement in the MIME sense of the word. Rather, it just has some binary uuencoded "garbage" added to the end of the message. Your client may be trying to help you by (...) (22 years ago, 10-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
