 | | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
|
(...) Have you considered switching to something like kagi.com? I haven't used them as a supplier, but I have as a customer, and I've gotten automated stuff from there before. And they seem to suck less than Paypal. (22 years ago, 12-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
|
(...) Zing! "Well played" as Sandlin would say. (...) D'Oh! Tom, are you still left hanging? As far as I'm aware, all the pending applications are processed up through I think Tuesday (two days ago). Of course, I may be unaware (ignorant!) of (...) (22 years ago, 12-Feb-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
|
(...) In what ways do we not have that forum with Lugnet? Although I use the NNTP interface, I find the web interface to be one of the best of any www-discussion forum out there. *Especially* when it comes to threads. [followup-to .general and (...) (22 years ago, 12-Feb-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Attachments?
|
|
"Fredrik Glöckner" <fredrigl@math.uio.no> wrote in message news:m3r7x26052.fsf@...ydomain... (...) In Outlook it looks like an attachment, and it shows it in the end of the message as a little smiley picture. (esmile.gif) /Joakim (22 years ago, 11-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Attachments?
|
|
As far as I can see, the article you're refering do does not have an attachement in the MIME sense of the word. Rather, it just has some binary uuencoded "garbage" added to the end of the message. Your client may be trying to help you by (...) (22 years ago, 10-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Attachments?
|
|
"Jocke" <terje029SPAMBLOCK@xpress.se> wrote in message news:HspKnI.1xqv@lugnet.com... (...) Is this group dead? =) /J (22 years ago, 10-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Quatro newsgroup, but no Racers newsgroup?
|
|
I don't think racers really belong in Duplo ;) seriously tho (and don't quote me here) but the policy tends to be product lines get a discussion group as a matter of course Quatro isn't Duplo, it isn't Primo it is an entirely new system. The policy (...) (22 years ago, 9-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Quatro newsgroup, but no Racers newsgroup?
|
|
(...) I think you're using the words "ridiculous" and "seriously wrong" a little lightly.... (22 years ago, 7-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Quatro newsgroup, but no Racers newsgroup?
|
|
So Quatro got its newsgroup, but RACERS still doesn't? This is ridiculous. Why not put it under Duplo? Something is seriously wrong here. When I asked for a Racers newsgroup, many people agreed. Racers is a much more popular theme among adults than (...) (22 years ago, 7-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Attachments?
|
|
Odd.. I have never seen attachments in messages before? (URL) use Outlook to read Lugnet) Is something broken on the server or is it possible to post attachments nowadays? /Joakim (22 years ago, 7-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
