Subject:
|
Re: LUGNET Guide updates (Sun 20 Jun 2010)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.database
|
Date:
|
Sun, 4 Jul 2010 18:41:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4198 times
|
| |
|
|
> > In lugnet.admin.database, Scott E. Sanburn wrote:
> > > I am not sure where to post this
In lugnet.admin.database, Henrik Christian Grove wrote:
> Neither am I, but this group seems to work.
Scott:
> > > - there are two sets missing,
Henrik:
> A lot more actually, these are sets I have but haven't been able to
> register in my lugnet profile:
<snip>
I must say I'm pleased that there's still interest in the database, it's been a
volunteer effort, and with flagging attention to LUGNET in general, we admins
don't always get right on the new sets immediately. [Truth-be-told, I tend to
deal in older sets, and clean up discrepancies in older sets as a group, more
than I enter new info; after a few years, there's a better "view" of how it all
fit together. Most recently, I did a small review of Scala sets, for instance]
I'm especially interested to hear that Henrik actually uses LUGNET to track his
sets. Very cool.
I'll try to get on these issues as I can. Hopefully, some other admins will
tend to them naturally in time as well.
Now that I know there's more than a passing interest, I'll try to keep an eye on
things better.
-- joshua
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LUGNET Guide updates (Sun 20 Jun 2010)
|
| (...) Neither am I, but this group seems to work. (...) A lot more actually, these are sets I have but haven't been able to register in my lugnet profile: (URL) ... applications which need to address vast amounts of memory (e.g., big scientific (...) (14 years ago, 1-Jul-10, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Database
|
|
|
|
|
|
