|
|
 | | Re: 1181 and 6485
|
| (...) I havn't checked the original catalog, but a little gimp-ing clears the picture enough to see it's really 6585... sorry for the confusion, Dan (25 years ago, 28-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.database)
| | | | | Re: 1181 and 6485
|
| (...) Ooh, wait, I just saw what Grahame wrote... Is that number 6485 a typo? It's really hard to make out on the box, but it looks like the number on the box might actually say 6585 and not 6485. Are you able to see on your original which one it (...) (25 years ago, 28-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.database)
| | | | | Re: 1181 and 6485
|
| (...) Wow, cool -- the first one is also 3069, a Kabaya set, and the second one is also numbered 6585 (both end in 85 :)... Do they have copyright dates? --Todd (25 years ago, 28-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.database)
| | | | | Re: 1181 and 6485
|
| (...) hmmm, you are correct... it seems that the catalog had a misprint... if you look carefully, with a little enhancement, you can see the box says 6585... :) Dan (25 years ago, 28-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.database)
| | | | | Re: 1181 and 6485
|
| (...) As Grahame notes, it looks like there is a typo in the catalogue, as the number on the box in the image clearly says "6585". Fredrik (25 years ago, 28-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
|
