 | | Brickset vs. Lugnet (Was Re: New Scala sets)
|
|
Frank Filz <ffilz@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:3A99D9CF.CB7D65...ing.com... (...) Todd may have a problem using Brickset data/images but personally I am happy for him and the other contributers to do so. (...) Unfortunately Todd and I (...) (24 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: New Scala sets
|
|
(...) willing to "borrow" pictures from Brickset). (...) I wish we could see a merging of the data from Brickshelf and Lugnet. Lugnet in general has a better engine, but Brickset is definitely more complete in many areas. Frank (24 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.scala, lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Basic set #4219 {Extra Bricks}
|
|
Basic set #4219 is in the database, but does not have a piece count. It contains 288 pieces. Martin (24 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: New Scala sets
|
|
(...) Hi Frank, no more need to use your scanner as I also got a Belville set this weekend and uploaded the new sets to www.brickset.com . Simply use the direct link if you only need the new Scala images: (URL) entire 2001 section is constantly (...) (24 years ago, 25-Feb-01, to lugnet.scala, lugnet.admin.database)
|
