 | | Re: Co-curator update needed?
|
|
(...) Thank goodness for that or those O.T. curators would have to, like, work on it or something... Waittaminit... Dave K (18 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.curators, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Co-curator update needed?
|
|
(...) This just in.... (18 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.curators, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Co-curator update needed?
|
|
(...) Actually, the last update I did anywhere in o.t. was to a sidebar in the o.t.clones group long ago when someone gave me a list of 'clone brand' sites. I've never really did anything since, though looking at it now and knowing all of Dave!'s (...) (18 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.curators, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Co-curator update needed?
|
|
(...) My misteak. I thought you had just checked your email box <wink wink nudge nudge, know-what-I-mean, say no more> (18 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.curators, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Co-curator update needed?
|
|
(...) FLASH!! Ou reporters have just unearthed this startling, world shaking discovery... Dave K (18 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.curators, FTX)
|
| |
| | A long sentence of relatively little import -- was Re: Co-curator update needed?
|
|
(...) This, of course, would play right into Matthew's idea-- (URL) I'll go-- "Flash! Ou reporters have just unearthed this startling, world shaking discovery!", exclaimed the visibly exhausted reporter as he stood in front of the newscamera and (...) (18 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
