| |
In lugnet.starwars, Mike Crowley wrote:
> When AT&T Broadband switched to Comcast over a year ago, I went into my
> profile here and changed my email. But, whenever I tried typing in my
> Comcast email into box up top when typing a new post, it would never accept
> the email -- I would click post, but it would tell me I entered in the wrong
> address. But, in my LUGNET profile, it shows the newer Comcast email
> address. I usually post a link to my website in my sig, from which the newer
> email addresses is accessible, but my site has been down for a while, and
> since I haven't built anything new in a while, and thus haven't posted here
> much lately, I didn't think not including the link to my page (with the newer
> email address) would be too much of a problem. Plus, email sent to the AT&T
> address has always just been forwarded automatically by Comcast to the new
> address. I usually get all sorts of automated junkmail from Comcast, some of
> which is mildly informative, but most which is not. Now that I look at a few
> of the more recent ones, I see that they mention that as of the new year they
> are no longer forwarding email sent to the old AT&T addresses. That must be
> why your message didn't get through. Maybe this is something Todd might be
> able to help me with? (Or. maybe I'm just not updating the address in the
> proper place?) THANX!
Maybe not!
Update it here:
http://news.lugnet.com/news/post/setup/
Then, since you're having trouble and we need to trace this one of us will
approve it right away. Then try posting to off-topic.test and send the admins
(and TODD) the exact error you get, if any. If you don't get any, a note to the
admins saying that would be nice.
It IS a ToS violation not to go to this page:
http://news.lugnet.com/news/post/setup/
and go through posting setup WHENEVER your email address changes.
Why?
It is MANDATORY that admins have a way to contact you if there is a need. You
can spam disguise it if you like in what appears on the site but a human who has
little tolerance for guesswork (such as me, I am more finicky and reject more
spam disguises than Todd does) MUST be able to easily and unambiguously decode
it without any special knowledge.
For instance my own disguise:
"Larry Pieniazek" <larry.(mylastname)@ascentialsoftware.DOT.com>
is quite unambigous, in my view.
Hope that helps.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Incorrect Links on SW Sidebar
|
| Hi, Lenny! (...) I tend to be a little wordy. ;) Both in real life and when typing, whenever I'm in a situtation where I am either trying to explain something, answer a sensitive question, or point out details, I've just got a habit of trying to get (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jan-05, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.admin.curators, FTX)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
