Administrative : Search Results: suggest


Administrative / Search Results: suggest

Results 61 – 80 of about 400.

Search took 0.00 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		News article snarfing & propagation (was: LEGO Calendar of Events)
(...) A bit more on article snarfing & propagation... If anyone happened to catch this article back in May, (URL) 3rd sub-item of the 4th main item there (the one which begins "Ability to snarf...") refers basically to personal weblogs[1] with (...) (25 years ago, 3-Sep-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

suggest
(score: 0.853)

		Re: Code Repository
(...) Since many algorithms apply across languages, what about a single repository for all code? (How about lugnet.robotics.rcx.code?) True, it would increase the noise-to-signal ratio for many, but it would Keep It Simple. Also, I favor follow-ups (...) (25 years ago, 16-Sep-99, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.admin.general)

suggest
(score: 0.852)

		Re: Code Repository
(...) Since many algorithms apply across languages, what about a single repository for all code? (How about lugnet.robotics.rcx.code?) True, it would increase the noise-to-signal ratio for many, but it would Keep It Simple. Also, I favor follow-ups (...) (25 years ago, 16-Sep-99, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.admin.general)

suggest
(score: 0.852)

		Re: RTL posting stats (was Re: Lugnet Newsgroups Anniversary!)
(...) [snipped way-cool graph] Very interesting. I hadn't thought of "draining" in terms of number of messages, I was thinking in terms of signal-to-noise. Which is a bit harder to graph. But the anecdotal evidence seems to suggest LUGNET is having (...) (25 years ago, 5-Oct-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)

suggest
(score: 0.850)

		Re: Toward LUGNET equality
In lugnet.adventurers, Mark Lindsey writes: <snip well thought out commentary> Mark, I don't think most people have a big problem with the topics you've been discussing. I think people have had a problem with >where< you've been discussing them. As (...) (25 years ago, 4-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)

suggest
(score: 0.847)

		Re: Toward LUGNET equality
(...) Well, the fact that they existed wasn't the point that actually annoyed me-- it was more directed at the 'contest' idea... What it seemed to me like you were doing is cross-posting these to lugnet.adventures for the sole purpose of building up (...) (25 years ago, 4-Nov-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

suggest
(score: 0.847)

		Re: COMPLETE LIST OF NEW SETS FOR 2000
(...) Of course he should - did I suggest otherwise? (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

suggest
(score: 0.845)

		Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
(...) Like for kvetching or a whinging/whining? :-) (...) Hmm, sticky point. (...) If Brad has no objections and could suggest a couple (or more, if he wants) sub-group topic areas that he and/or his colleagues would find most helpful, I'm all for (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)

suggest
(score: 0.845)

		Re: COMPLETE LIST OF NEW SETS FOR 2000
(...) I don't want to get into the whole "if you and Suz say you really want someone to do something that doesn't necessarily mean they have to do it or become persona non grata around LUGNET" issue because, to some extent, I don't think it's worth (...) (25 years ago, 7-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

suggest
(score: 0.844)

		Re: Remy is in the clear (was: Re: YEAR-2000 LEAKS STOP HERE)
To all here.... The recent Lego Direct announcement, along with all the new set pic's and excitement, have clouded normally clear heads. May I suggest we all calm down, stop acting like excited children, and take a deep breath..... after all, we (...) (25 years ago, 11-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

suggest
(score: 0.844)

		Re: Help: Re: review: LEGO '99
(...) Actually it wouldn't matter too much if false matches were made, as the context would be enough for people to recognize that this is a real set number. The idea is to just provide a quick link to the database so that people can see a set if (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

suggest
(score: 0.844)

		Re: sensors (was: Re: New newsgroup lugnet.loc.eu)
I guess I vote to keep it together, at this level of daily posts.. If we get like sci.electronics.design then we can worry about it. If we DID make a separate list, I would suggest it be HOMEBREW to cover all user-designed and built Sensors AND (...) (25 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.admin.general)

suggest
(score: 0.844)

		Intellectual exercise (was Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs)
If I were to post the results of this script: #!/usr/bin/perl for ($i=0;$i<1000000;$i++) { printf "(URL) $i; } to LUGnet, and some of the links that result happen to not have links on any of Lego's linked-from-the-main-page pages, would I be in (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

suggest
(score: 0.843)

		Set Links (was Re: Help: Re: review: LEGO '99)
(...) URLs that point to non-existant sites are still displayed as links, though. If a number is indicated by someone to be a set number using whatever syntax, but there is no such set (or at least not yet) I think that it should still be a link. (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

suggest
(score: 0.843)

		Re: Language slipping?
In lugnet.admin.general, Christopher Lannan writes: More thoughts- What about the AFOL acronymn "POOP" How many of us can honestly say it wasn't chosen because of its "potty humour" nature. Piece out of other pieces should be pooop, shouldn't it? I (...) (25 years ago, 22-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

suggest
(score: 0.843)

		Re: Enough already
Mike Stanley wrote: <snip> (...) Yeah, I think we got y'all's point. But I think the real point is: legalities aside, TLC didn't want that material distributed around. Just because one is able to get something on this side of a firewall doesn't (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)

suggest
(score: 0.843)

		Re: Enough already
(...) A clearer distinction can be drawn by saying "you are acting like a such and such" as opposed to saying "you are a such and such." Similar to the difference between "you are lying" and "you are a liar." By criticizing someone's action or (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)

suggest
(score: 0.843)

		Unique keys for sets
Would it possible and reasonable to add a unique key to the Pause database setlists? In effect, to add another column to: (URL) the related lists. I've got a fairly hairy spreadsheet that I use to keep track of my sets. I use the Pause database as a (...) (25 years ago, 27-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.database)

suggest
(score: 0.842)

		Re: Maybe "Dear Lego" sub groups would help
(...) I think "bulk" is probably sufficient to convey the meaning, but "bulksales" is more clear. (...) Definitely .legal. Copyright is far too narrow. "Fair play" may not always be the name of the Lego Company's statement. And that may be too (...) (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

suggest
(score: 0.842)

		Re: eudora thread bug
(...) Could you not swear, please? It dilutes your message and makes you look like you're either incapable of expressing your sentiments in a thoughtful manner, or that you're immature. I don't think either of those actually apply. I'm with Mike, I (...) (25 years ago, 30-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

suggest
(score: 0.842)

More: Next Page >>