Results 181 – 200 of about 400.
|
Search took 0.00 CPU seconds.
|
|
 | | Re: Uselessness of .debate
|
| I *said* they had flaws and were thought starters... so you'll see a smiley behind every one of my responses, I'm trying to be funny in them. I suggest you post some ideas of your own, I'm trying to get some brainstorming going... (...) Why not? (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|  
suggest
(score: 0.809)
|
|
| | Re: Uselessness of .debate
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:>>Hey, that's a good idea- if you pay to become a Lugnet member, you're allowed (...) I'm not yet a member (mainly because most of my posting has been to OT rather than LEGO-specific contributions), (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.809)
|
|
| | Re: Uselessness of .debate
|
| (...) I'll take some culpability here, I'm a sucker for trying to show up the clueless, and no matter how many times I swear it off, it's just too tempting... he's just so cluelessly annoying when he wants to be. (but he CAN be a good contributor (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.809)
|
|
| | Re: Uselessness of .debate
|
| (...) I think there is some overflow from .debate into other groups. I can't absolutely put my finger on it (in part because I realize that in part the Larry vs. Scott shouting match may have started outside of .debate, but I certainly see linkage (...) (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.809)
|
|
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.809)
|
|
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.808)
|
|
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.805)
|
|
| | Re: Lego for sale
|
| (...) Hmm - placing it is a tricky issue. I don't think it needs separate auction/shopping/buy-sell-trade divisions, but if you put it as a sub-division of the existing auction/shopping/buy-sell-trade groups then that's what it would be - split. The (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.805)
|
|
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.805)
|
|
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| (...) Are the web sales part of Shop at Home? I was originally going to suggest Shop at Home, but then I thought about the web sales. Of course the other question is where do the LICs, outlets, etc. fall? Deals there probably should be posted in the (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.803)
|
|
| | Re: Announcement: Member pages
|
| (...) First, be careful to read the Lugnet Use Agreement. Anything you post on your "personal" lugnet page grants Lugnet *and* third-parties a non-exclusive license to reproduce, edit, post your material on the web and on any communications media. (...) (24 years ago, 1-Mar-01, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.802)
|
|
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| (...) Sure. They can't hurt, and adding them gives you the coverage you need to toast the mostly obsolete dear-lego group. I'd suggest having them as just .rant and .rave instead of under the .lego.* hierarchy, to avoid implications that they're (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.802)
|
|
| | Re: New Group Proposal - LUGNET.LEGO.QA
|
| (...) The only thing that I'd suggest is making the name a little more clear. At first glance I thought it would be for QA (quality assurance) issues, like the infamous Tan bricks with black swirls, percieved degradations in tolerances, etc. Maybe (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.802)
|
|
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| (...) I agree with the comment that it shouldn't be under .lego. Otherwise, this sounds like a good way to deal with the type of comments you describe. (...) Ditto my comments about .rant. Plus, I'd recomend a name change. The term rave has certain (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.802)
|
|
| | Re: Flogs, flogging, floggers, brags, bragging, braggers
|
| (...) Ooh, Scott's sentence structure there is icky. There's some double negatavism going on, but the phrase "does it not belong" is usually intended to mean the same is "is it true that it belongs"... (...) One thing I strongly suggest you also add (...) (24 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.802)
|
|
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| (...) I like the idea for all of these although I can see quite a bit of crossposting between .debate and the other 2. Maybe these groups should have restricted cross-posting? I.E. No cross posting at all or the only crossposting would be allowed if (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.802)
|
|
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| (...) I have mixed feelings about trying to apply order in matters of speech. I appreciate trying to make things orderly, and by segregating posts to areas they would be sought in would avoid flames from people who have to wade through messages (...) (24 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.802)
|
|
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| (My newsreader objected to my attempt to reply to Todd's original message, so I'm replying to a followup) (...) Lugnet.lego.{rant,rave,debate} get my vote. That makes it more clear that they are distinct from the non-lego groups. I'm not sure (...) (24 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.802)
|
|
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| (...) Wow. Well thanx for starting this discussion up Todd. It focuses into one thread what a lot of people have been talking about on and off for some time. I've read all the posts that are available and found about 15 that had a point in it that I (...) (24 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.802)
|
|
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| Ok, some initial thoughts.... I was opposed to a .rant type group earlier, I now see that it could be valuable. One question though is how to get the ranting to move there. I don't think we can eliminate initial rants in response to an announcement, (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.802)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
