|
 | | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
| In lugnet.cad, Dave Schuler wrote: --snip-- (...) I think I see a bit better what you were getting at (and what Tore is getting at too which is the same issue I think). I kind of do agree with you both that making new parts is too hard due in part (...) (15 years ago, 20-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|  
lego
(score: 0.509)
|
|
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
| (...) Welcome back. My issue with that is that it's out of the hands of LDraw. It's hard to expect the people responsible for LUGNET to make big changes when it's pretty much just one small section that is active. Tim (15 years ago, 20-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
lego
(score: 0.509)
|
|
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
| (...) Possibly so but I'm of the opinion that those that make and share the parts are entitled to some narcissism. And I speak having done minimal part authoring in quite some time (due to laziness) so it's not self-interest at work. --snip-- Your (...) (15 years ago, 20-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
lego
(score: 0.509)
|
|
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
| --snip-- (...) Please excuse ne while I become really blunt ;) That information isn't there for the end users. It's there for the people volunteering their time to make the parts. As Philo said it's very easy to add automatically with DATHeader and (...) (15 years ago, 20-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
lego
(score: 0.509)
|
|
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
| --snip-- (...) I must admit that I hadn't realised it was so hard to post now. That, IMO, means we need somewhere new to discuss LDraw. If new people can't easily post in discussions then we are killing fresh discussion and that is a very bad move. (...) (15 years ago, 19-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
lego
(score: 0.509)
|
|
| | Re: 8258
|
| (...) What do you consider reasonable? This set sold out very quickly and rumor has it that no more will be produced. This means that it is already a collectible item. The longer you wait to get it the more it will cost. I doubt you will find one (...) (14 years ago, 27-Apr-10, to lugnet.technic)
| |
|
lego
(score: 0.509)
|
|
| | Re: Password Change
|
| (...) This question still needs to be answered. I recently was able to get my password reset and log back on to update my set list. However, how does one go about changing one's own password!?! The note I got from Rene when he emailed me my new (...) (15 years ago, 9-Mar-10, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
lego
(score: 0.509)
|
|
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
| (...) Also threads with recent discssion are marked visually as being such and there's an Active Topics list available next to View New Posts. I'm going to be a little stirring here and suggest that possibly many of the same people demanding that (...) (15 years ago, 17-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
lego
(score: 0.509)
|
|
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
| (...) Group discussion comments are very searchable ((URL) Image comments aren't which I agree can be frustrating. And flickr is very good at telling you where there is activity. Which isn't to say it's a good place to discuss LDraw. It is not. The (...) (15 years ago, 17-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
lego
(score: 0.509)
|
|
| |
|
lego
(score: 0.509)
|
|
| | LUCNY
|
| Can we get LUCNY added back to the LTC map again, please? Thanks, Ed McGlynn LEGO Users of Central New York (14 years ago, 20-Apr-10, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
lego
(score: 0.509)
|
|
| |
|
lego
(score: 0.509)
|
|
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
| (...) Not sure which forums you visit but they must be unusually obtuse. Just about everywhere I visit tells you which threads have new posts since you last visited and an unread topics page. --snip-- (...) Tim (15 years ago, 17-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
lego
(score: 0.508)
|
|
| |
|
lego
(score: 0.508)
|
|
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
| --snip-- (...) --snip-- (...) Honestly I don't think LDD is so much of a competitor for many people. Its limited parts pallette keeps it quite restrictive. LDraw will always be the high end tool for LEGO CAD due to its versatility and when people (...) (15 years ago, 14-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
lego
(score: 0.508)
|
|
| | STRATEGY: LEGO Group -changing move
|
| February 25, 2010 STRATEGIC INSIGHT - GLOBAL LOGISTICS : EUROPE LEGO game-changing move By James A. Cooke The toymaker's bold decision to serve Europe and Asia from a single DC in the Czech Republic cut logistics costs by 20 percent. But bringing (...) (15 years ago, 4-Mar-10, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general, FTX)
| |
|
lego
(score: 0.508)
|
|
| |
|
lego
(score: 0.508)
|
|
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
| --snip-- (...) That structure attracted 6.2 thousand comments last year out of 8.4 million page views. You may not like it (I prefer threading too) but it's here to stay. And between TBB and flickr (same structure) there are already over 40 comments (...) (15 years ago, 15-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
lego
(score: 0.508)
|
|
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
| (...) I hadn't really thought about the pool of volunteers drying out but you are right that it is. Even the 'new' names in key roles have been involved for many years now. And for many years we have not needed an election for the SteerCo as only 5 (...) (15 years ago, 15-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
lego
(score: 0.508)
|
|
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
| (...) Out of the thirty odd responses I've got so far to my questions on TBB there hasn't been one mentioning ease of discussion so I'll hazard a guess that it's not a big deal. Tim (15 years ago, 15-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
lego
(score: 0.508)
|
