|
 | | Re: News-by-Mail digests
|
| [whoops, this time the Followup-To field is actually set to lugnet.admin.general; I forgot to do that last time.] (...) OK. People receiving duplicates won't disrupt the ng's any, so if duplicate messages aren't annoying to you, then they're not a (...) (26 years ago, 11-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|  
set, followup, header
(score: 5.301)
|
|
| | Re: Line wrapping in lugnet.cad.dat files
|
| (...) Cool, you can test away some more then, if you like... With regard to logging it as a bug, I thought about the problem a bit more and decided to fix it right away rather than queueing it up. The same part of the code which checks for special (...) (26 years ago, 14-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
set, followup, header
(score: 5.300)
|
|
| | Re: Lugnet.robotics and the Robotics List
|
| Todd Lehman wrote in message <36794b80.31897794@l...et.com>... (...) I'd have to experiment and see what happens if a user does a reply to all in that case. If it sends to the people in the Reply-To header as well as the To header then it would work (...) (26 years ago, 17-Dec-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
set, followup, header
(score: 5.299)
|
|
| | Re: ng/ml gatewaying
|
| (...) Seriously? Okie dokie then, this'll be a snap to fix. Happy day! I'll disable 'From'-header munging for the lugnet.robotics->lego-robotics gateway (leaving it in for now on the other ng/ml gateways). You'll still be able to see real-life names (...) (26 years ago, 14-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
set, followup, header
(score: 5.298)
|
|
| | Re: Proper place to post US S@H Phone Specials
|
| (...) Yes, a group can be made to be read-only for everyone except the server administrator and a moderator (or a set of moderators). I've never created a moderated group before, but as far as I can tell, they're fairly easy to set up inside the (...) (26 years ago, 2-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
set, followup, header
(score: 5.297)
|
|
| |
|
set, followup, header
(score: 5.297)
|
|
| |
|
set, followup, header
(score: 5.297)
|
|
| | Re: Proposal for Revised Memorial
|
| (...) The Reply button/keystroke should reply to the poster only -- that's how newsreaders work and that's how mailing lists are supposed to work. To reply to the group instead of the poster only, simply use the Reply-All function instead of Reply. (...) (26 years ago, 9-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
set, followup, header
(score: 5.296)
|
|
| | Re: Excessive Cross Posting
|
| (...) I mostly concur, I just sometimes wonder if it might be the best solution (of course the counter to that is that you get the jerks who work around the cross posting rules by posting individually to each group - but they can be TOSed). (...) (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
set, followup, header
(score: 5.295)
|
|
| | [Part] 3841.dat Minifig Tool Pickaxe [DAT]
|
| Dear Ldraw developers, This is my first attempt to create an Ldraw part. You professional part developers, would you be so kind as to have a look at it before I submit it to next vote. I'd like to be confirmed in the next issues: 1. Is 3841 the (...) (25 years ago, 28-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dat)
| |
|
outlook, set, header
(score: 5.295)
|
|
| |
|
set, followup, header
(score: 5.295)
|
|
| | Re: IMAP vs MAPI
|
| (...) It does. You just have to set it in the account options thingies. I use Outlook 98 now and I fear Express junking my settings or I'd run it to find the specifics for you. I'll create a new user on my NT machine at work tomorrow and fire up OE (...) (26 years ago, 15-Jan-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| |
|
outlook, express, set
(score: 5.288)
|
|
| |
|
express, set, followup
(score: 5.286)
|
|
| | Re: TLG investigation 1st answers
|
| (...) this (...) Fair enough. You make a good point. I knew (well, suspected) somehow or another that the car anology wouldn't hold up, but my point is that I personally think it may be better to look forward than look back. To me the nostalgic (...) (26 years ago, 23-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
outlook, express, set
(score: 5.283)
|
|
| | RCX2 API Update
|
| I made some mistakes in the first release, so here is a new version. I've also added counter support. <-Readme.txt-> RCX2 Header file for NQC2.1r2 - 27 April 2000 - James Pritchard rcx2api.nqh - NQC Header file that contains constant and macros for (...) (24 years ago, 29-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| |
|
express, set, header
(score: 5.274)
|
|
| | RCX2 API
|
| I've put together a NQC API file that allows you to use some of the RCX2 features. I don't no whether anyone else has already done this but here is mine. This is unofficial so is unsupported. All question should go to the group, not Dave or myself. (...) (24 years ago, 26-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| |
|
express, set, header
(score: 5.273)
|
|
| | RCX2 API
|
| I've put together a NQC API file that allows you to use some of the RCX2 features. I don't no whether anyone else has already done this but here is mine. This is unofficial so is unsupported. All question should go to the group, not Dave or myself. (...) (24 years ago, 26-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| |
|
express, set, header
(score: 5.273)
|
|
| |
|
express, set, header
(score: 5.273)
|
|
| | Another license draft
|
| Hi, After some more dicussion, I have come to the following proposal for the license. It's much simpler than Steve's first license but I think it covers all important points. I have also copied some parts of the GPL text because I think they are (...) (24 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev) !
| |
|
express, set, header
(score: 5.272)
|
|
| |
|
express, set, header
(score: 5.272)
|
