|
 | | Chance to be a Christmas Angel...(?)
|
| Someone has emailed me after finding my address from LUGNET looking for a 4561 Railway Express Set. He has found a battered copy in a local Toys R Us but would like a good one because 'Father Christmas can't deliver a battered set'! Can anyone help (...) (22 years ago, 18-Dec-02, to lugnet.loc.uk)
| |
|  
help, express, set
(score: 6.034)
|
|
| |
|
help, express, set
(score: 6.033)
|
|
| | Re: Year 2002 gone
|
| Well the header is still there, just all the messages are gone. I even unsubscribe and subscribed again but it didn't help. We use Outlook 5.5. Rose "Dan Boger" <dan@peeron.com> wrote in message news:200109290359.f8...ron.com... (...) section (...) (...) (23 years ago, 29-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
help, outlook, header
(score: 5.730)
|
|
| | Re: Newsgroup for PNLTC
|
| (...) Oops, my fault -- I forgot to set the 'Followup-To:' header in that article. (...) That's REALLY odd. Because it's not in 'active' here on the server and doing "telnet lugnet.com 119" and then "list" -- it doesn't show up. I'll bet you're (...) (26 years ago, 29-Sep-98, to lugnet.trains)
| |
|
set, followup, header
(score: 5.328)
|
|
| | autoFAQpost /general/howto_set_followupto_in_email.en.faq
|
| Subject: How can I set the "Followup-To" when posting a message via e-mail? Topic-Level: 1 Content-Language: en Originator: Jeremy Sproat, 1999-01-26 Revision: Todd Lehman, 1999-01-26 Reference: (URL) /general/ <P> If your e-mail app supports (...) (25 years ago, 12-Jul-99, to lugnet.faq)
| |
|
set, followup, header
(score: 5.327)
|
|
| | Re: New Scenes at BrickDreams, and Thanks
|
| (...) It's fine, but you might want to set the 'Followup-To:' header to point at lugnet.cad.ray if you expect the discussion to wander in that direction (like, let's say, in-depth discussion of the tools you used and things like that). Otherwise, (...) (24 years ago, 25-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.publish, lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
set, followup, header
(score: 5.324)
|
|
| |
|
set, followup, header
(score: 5.323)
|
|
| |
|
set, followup, header
(score: 5.323)
|
|
| | Re: So few threads...
|
| (...) Oh, were that it were! :-, Tamy, I noticed that while the Followup-To: header was set to lugnet.off-topic.fun, your message was still posted into both lugnet.off-topic.fun and lugnet.general. It seems you're posting via the e-mail interface. I (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| |
|
set, followup, header
(score: 5.315)
|
|
| | Re: what is this folow up thingy?
|
| No -- carbon copies are e-mail directives. Followup-To is a NNTP header field. Followup-To specifies what newsgroup an article will go in when someone posts a followup to it. If you post message A in group X, and the Followup-To field of A is set (...) (26 years ago, 20-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
set, followup, header
(score: 5.313)
|
|
| | Re: Possible bug with "Reply"-button
|
| (...) It's not a bug, but actually a (little-known) feature of the NNTP protocol/ format: If the Followup-To header is set to "poster", then your newsreader is supposed to direct replies to the poster rather than to a newsgroup. -- Todd S. Lehman | (...) (23 years ago, 19-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
set, followup, header
(score: 5.311)
|
|
| | Re: Green Wizard/Witch Hat - what set?
|
| (...) Bryce, It's not possible to actually "move" a message from one forum to another, but there's something called the "Followup-To:" field that you can set within the header of a message -- and it directs followups that people post into another (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jul-99, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
set, followup, header
(score: 5.311)
|
|
| | Re: Too much FUT??? (Was re:Villager Mini-Figs)
|
| (...) I personally don't care much about moving threads. Half the time, when a thread is moved, it dies out quickly. And if it isn't moved, it continues to grow, staying off-topic. Half of one, six dozen of the other. BUT, anytime anyone ever (...) (25 years ago, 14-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
set, followup, header
(score: 5.311)
|
|
| | Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
|
| (...) You make a good point, Alfred. Personally, I think Randall's original message to lugnet.general was misplaced -- although I believe he was probably trying to reach people in lugnet.general specifically since that's where so much vitriol had (...) (20 years ago, 19-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
set, followup, header
(score: 5.309)
|
|
| |
|
set, followup, header
(score: 5.306)
|
|
| |
|
set, followup, header
(score: 5.305)
|
|
| | Re: Oops! Stopping a cross-posting thread
|
| (...) If you catch the "mistake" earlier enough, you can go back and cancel the article after you see it appear, then re-post the corrected version. In this case, since someone has already replied, you wouldn't want to go back and cancel it or else (...) (26 years ago, 26-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
set, followup, header
(score: 5.303)
|
|
| | Re: Possible bug with "Reply"-button
|
| (...) Neat. I'm not sure if it's a bug or a feature. If you look at the message header, you'll notice that "Followup-To:" is set for "poster", which turns the reply button into a "mailto:" command. Presumably that's something that Daniel has (...) (23 years ago, 19-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
set, followup, header
(score: 5.303)
|
|
| | Re: X-Real-Life-Name header
|
| (...) OK, I guess that the msg that made you post this should have had the Followup-To field set......... I'll try to remember that. ____ |oooo| Cheers, |oooo| Wouter ¯¯¯¯ (26 years ago, 30-Sep-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
set, followup, header
(score: 5.303)
|
|
| | Re: CFD: robotics sub-groups
|
| (...) As you (may or may not) know, every lugnet.* newsgroup automatically has its own integrated mailing-list gateway. (For example, lugnet.trains@lugnet.com is the mailing list isomorphic to the lugnet.trains newsgroup.) While redundant echoes of (...) (26 years ago, 22-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
set, followup, header
(score: 5.301)
|
