LUGNET News : Search Results: "Impossible to disassemble"


Search Results: "Impossible to disassemble"

Results 351 – 370 of about 2800.

Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: Why Blue windows?
Mayb e so they should be easier to spot on a floor? Or perhaps light-blue windows doesn't get that "solid"-look that clear windows get when they get scratched. I have some old clear windshields and they are impossible to see through. Well, not (...) (24 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.general)

impossible
(score: 1.095)

		Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?
(...) well, I was only considering the arena of ideas... (...) Objectivity is usually taken to mean "independent of the observer." Since it's impossible to NOT be an observer of the universe, therefore, objectivity is impossible, goes the argument. (...) (25 years ago, 13-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

impossible
(score: 1.095)

		Re: Lego disclaimers on sites
Shiri Dori wrote: [...] (...) Impossible to know. (...) Below are my facts as described (some years ago) when I dropped my domain name. Note, the Fair Play document has since moved to: www.lego.com/info/fair.asp (URL) update: Because Lego failed to (...) (25 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.dear-lego)

impossible
(score: 1.095)

		Re: my moc: VIA F40PH
(...) Troublesome, yes. Impossible...no. Christopher Masi (I think it was he) did sloping grilles on one of his diesels. It uses two 1x2 inverse slopes, two grille tiles, a 1x2 to 1x4 bracket and a hinge (or hinges). Perhaps he could provide a URL. (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jan-01, to lugnet.trains)

impossible
(score: 1.095)

		Re: Macro-Evolution - Impossible!
(...) and what little does is some 40 years old--the palaeontological equivalent of considering an IBM PC-XT "cutting edge" in 2001, just because it's only a dozen or so years old. It's selective misinformation--Kitts's work is even older, mostly in (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

impossible
(score: 1.095)

		Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!")
(...) have (...) level is the Big Bang theory, which has nothing to do with Darwin's theory of (...) In your experience, perhaps, but then we're all limited by our own personal experiences. Evolution and the theory of origins, and the Big Bang are (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

impossible
(score: 1.094)

		Re: challenge: LEGO copier
(...) Why would that be impossible? You'd start by building up the sides; when you've done row B, then you can attach the block in row C, followed by the one in row D. So yes, this means the robot has to be able to move back and forth; it can't just (...) (20 years ago, 5-Aug-04, to lugnet.robotics)

impossible
(score: 1.094)

		Re: Polyamory
Dave Schuler wrote in message ... (...) I don't like to say impossible... but certainly improbable. A combination of people is more likely. But in fact I think you're right that ALL needs should not be expected to be met - apart from anything else, (...) (24 years ago, 14-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

impossible
(score: 1.094)

		Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism
(...) 50, (...) markedly (...) negative?) (...) the (...) in (...) base (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

impossible
(score: 1.094)

		Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!")
Tim: Thank-you. You got ahead of me, but I suppose that's ok. I wanted to reach some agreement on the basis for the debate before I began to present research. I will continue to go down that road, but your references should give them some food for (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

impossible
(score: 1.094)

		Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!")
(...) Yes, thank you Tim, since you answered a question that Jon has ducked through dozens of posts in several debates and threads thereof. And thank you for providing some references, so that those of us who support evolution are at last able to (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

impossible
(score: 1.094)

		Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!")
Looks like Tims' running strongly - I may just need to sit back and watch. -Jon (...) that (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

impossible
(score: 1.094)

		Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!")
(...) Do you understand what a theory is? Do you understand that gravity is a theory? Do you understand that science deals in theories all the time? (...) Man's best friend (dogs). Tested, observed, and demonstrable. Perhaps you may wish to be more (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

impossible
(score: 1.094)

		Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!")
Tim Culberson wrote: <snipped> (...) ??? I sure hope your mistaken about the relationship between science and theory. You see, I teach two intro science labs today where I plan to discuss the scientific method, including how hypothesis testing leads (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

impossible
(score: 1.094)

		Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!")
(...) and science", which means that he didn't get a degree. "He then transferred to Midwestern Baptist College to double major in Bible and education." Therefore he abandoned, for whatever reason, his pursuit of a science or math degree in favor of (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

impossible
(score: 1.094)

		Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!")
(...) Far more important than your perception of his credentials is his facts. Are they correct? Get past the rhetoric and personal attack - his methods are probably as distatesful as others on the other side - but that's not the point. Are the (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

impossible
(score: 1.094)

		Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!")
(...) If you had read Tim's post, rather than leaping to disagree with mine, you'd have noticed that Tim asked me to consult the page in question before questioning Dr. Dino's credibility. I examined the page, as Tim asked, and, having found found (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

impossible
(score: 1.094)

		Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!")
Jennifer Clark writes (with snips of some excellent points): (...) A great point--I wish I'd made it. One might as readily include the Evolution of Dave Schuler! from infant to (supposed) adult as a forbidden topic. (Or, more seriously, the (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

impossible
(score: 1.094)

		Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!")
(...) It is interesting still further that he doesn't specify the subject in which he received his degrees. For instance, numerous fly-by-night organizations offer two-week doctorates in "divinity," so until and unless he specifies, I'm no more (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

impossible
(score: 1.094)

		Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!")
(...) Schoolbooks due suffer from a variety of errors. This however is not because Darwinian Evolution is wrong, but rather because the people writing the books are more interested in selling them then getting their facts right. (...) For the same (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

impossible
(score: 1.094)

More: Next Page >>