To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  Search Results: "Impossible to disassemble"
 Results 291 – 310 of about 2800.
Search took 0.00 CPU seconds. 

Messages:  Full | Brief | Compact
Sort:  Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

  Re: Evolution - Impossible!
 
(...) You're missing the point again. I started the thread - and I asked for refutation - it is you who have provided none. Nor have you cited any published articles which refute it. My condition stands. You are the target of your own words. Somehow (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

impossible
(score: 1.096)

  Re: Evolution - Impossible!
 
(...) Sorry for the delay in replying to this -- I've just spent a few very relaxing days by the beach! *Donahue's introduction Two glaring flaws. He links abiogenesis to species-becomes-species evolution, and says that if he can disprove the former (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

impossible
(score: 1.096)

  Re: Evolution - Impossible!
 
(...) (URL) Dave! (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

impossible
(score: 1.096)

  Re: Evolution - Impossible!
 
I have seen ET, and we is he! ;-) Actually, considering the vast #s of chemicals/compounds available in the Soup of Space, it would not surprise me at all to find out that life here originated from Seed Matter from space. After all, the universe had (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

impossible
(score: 1.096)

  Re: Evolution - Impossible!
 
(...) Coupled with the evidence I heard that mamalian amino acids appeared to have come from space as well (I.E. specifically mamalian amino acids didn't develop here on Earth), it makes even more sense. Also with the fact that both here and on (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

impossible
(score: 1.096)

  Re: Impossible to take apart - reprise
 
(...) I came across the same problem when I took my <set:8448> apart. I think "theoretically" it's not different from separating two plates - it's possible but sometimes the height of the plate does not provide a good grip and it's hard to apply (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jun-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)
 

impossible
(score: 1.096)

  Re: MISSION IMPOSSIBLE:
 
Get on of those small, unjuniorized sets that is really complicated. You can put it together instead of crushing, which might work better. Or you could build a robot and have it shoot you or roll over you. When you wake up you could put it back (...) (23 years ago, 3-Jul-01, to lugnet.build, lugnet.castle)
 

impossible
(score: 1.096)

  Mission Impossible: Find these Technic parts
 
Your mission, if you choose to accept it, is to help me locate these pieces. Brickbay seems to be out of all but the plates at the moment, and I'm willing to trade or pay for anything you can find. Bricks with holes: 1x14 - 2 blue (parts ref #32018) (...) (23 years ago, 25-Nov-01, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
 

impossible
(score: 1.096)

  Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!"
 
(...) Okay, but you haven't named names in any thread in which you've participated. My objection isn't simply to your line of reasoning (which is a substantial objection, I grant you) but rather to your willful choice not to support your claims (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

impossible
(score: 1.096)

  MISSION IMPOSSIBLE:
 
An innocent guard stands guard at the clock tower, a sharp halberd in his hand. Beneath him is a mighty treasure in the tower's prison. Tic, Tic, Tic, BEEP-BEEP! The clock strikes Ten AM. The guard knows what is coming. The hand of doom rises over (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.build, lugnet.castle)
 

impossible
(score: 1.096)

  Re: Another dream -impossible creations ;-)
 
(...) Do we need a lugnet.general.dreams section? :) (snip) (...) Sounds like a sort of cam. The problem with cams like that where the outputs are fixed to the cam is if you have more than one output, they bash into each other before you have turned (...) (24 years ago, 2-Sep-00, to lugnet.build, lugnet.technic)
 

impossible
(score: 1.096)

  Macro-Evolution - Impossible!
 
"Remember, the evidence the fossil record gives us is not about *how* macroevolution happens, merely that it does." ++Lar The fossil record as an evidence for macro-evolution has two aspects which must be considered: 1) Do strata (layers of soil) (...) (24 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

impossible
(score: 1.096)

  Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!"
 
(...) Yes, it does support a progression of life through time. You are welcome to present a different hypothesis. (...) Yes. (24 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

impossible
(score: 1.096)

  Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!"
 
(...) I thought that the fossil record does not show any evidence of survival of the fittest. It is my understanding that the fossil record does show ample evidence of evolution per se, but gives no reason why. "Survival of the fittest" is a catch (...) (24 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

impossible
(score: 1.096)

  Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!"
 
(...) I stand corrected. With the caveat that Darwin had no part in the phrase "survival of the fittest". Evolution was postulated before Darwin, he simply came up with an explanation for the mechanism behind it. His evidence was in large part from (...) (24 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

impossible
(score: 1.096)

  Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!"
 
(...) Ok, so you're saying it can't be debated? You think evolution is a fact? If you don't like my #2, please restate it in the form you like better. After everyone agrees on the form of the question - I'll then address it as the unsupportable (...) (24 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

impossible
(score: 1.096)

  Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!"
 
(...) Hardly - but that shows you just how easliy you've bought into the theory. If my statement isn't sufficient for you, please write one, and I'll address it. Please be concise. -Jon (24 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

impossible
(score: 1.096)

  Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!"
 
(...) Jon: You've repeatedly mentioned leading scientists and overwhelming numbers to defend your case against evolution without giving actual names or numbers. For the umpteenth time, can you provide any actual names or numbers, other than those (...) (24 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

impossible
(score: 1.096)

  Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!"
 
(...) You keep making these claims, but I have seen no evidence of such (debate within science on if evolution happens). You are welcome to submit such (gotta be accredited scientists in scientific journals - spare me the religious crackpots). You, (...) (24 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

impossible
(score: 1.096)

  Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!"
 
(...) First - I've never said "leading" scientists, since that is always open to debate. I understand your thoughts/feelings on this - however, with this thread I'm trying to establish what it is that I should be addressing regarding evolution - (...) (24 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

impossible
(score: 1.096)

More:  Next Page >>


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR