To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  Search Results: "Impossible to disassemble"
 Results 271 – 290 of about 2800.
Search took 0.00 CPU seconds. 

Messages:  Full | Brief | Compact
Sort:  Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

  Impossible to take apart - reprise
 
After enjoying the discussion about the hard-to-take-apart cube I thought about some constuctions myself. Couldn't come up with something simple and elegant so far, however....... I'm just after taking the 8448.... almost. In the door-opening (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jun-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)
 

impossible
(score: 1.097)

  My RACHAL Impossible - Hacked
 
Hi folks, I submitted my (URL) RACHAL - the Raytracing Challenge> entry "Hacked" to the "(URL)" Gallery at LDraw.org: (URL) More about the rendering process can be found (URL) here>. PLMKWYT. w. (17 years ago, 30-May-07, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)
 

impossible
(score: 1.097)

  Re: Futuron Mini-figs (was Re: Lego-Direct)
 
Tim, (...) Well, I think this thread started out wishing for the impossible, so I put up my impossible wish. I would be happy with another 20 so or each, but since it is impossible, lets go for the big numbers! :) I always wanted to build a really (...) (25 years ago, 1-Feb-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.dear-lego)
 

impossible
(score: 1.097)

  Re: Impossible to take apart - reprise
 
(...) Yes, that was a bit of a struggle, but try to stack two of the "Bracket 5 x 2 x 2&1/3" togheter so that the 2x3 "plates" connects and the 2x2 "plates" connect. They will be one stud offset. Hum, this came otu to be hard to describe. Just put (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jun-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)
 

impossible
(score: 1.097)

  Re: Impossible to take apart - reprise
 
(...) I have had the exact same problem with that little assembly on the 8448 Super Street Sensation. Despite repeated attempts with pushing axle through the holes I have not been able to pull the two elements apart yet. It's too bad since I only (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jun-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)
 

impossible
(score: 1.097)

  RACHAL Impossible entry - Comic Sans
 
(URL) Hi all, Well I finally remembered to add this to the RACHAL gallery... This is my second entry (URL) "Comic Sans"> to (URL) RACHAL Impossible>. I basically wanted to have a play around with making comics style imagery out of a semi-realistic (...) (17 years ago, 6-Jun-07, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)
 

impossible
(score: 1.097)

  Rendering impossible to build models
 
(...) I am well aware of what POV can render. I have been modeling in POV for years, long before I discoved tools for creating dat files and converting them to POV. Although your models are very cool looking, They appear to not be buildable out of (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

impossible
(score: 1.096)

  Re: Evolution - Impossible!
 
As I've stated before, I don't have tons of time to devote to this and I'd much prefer a point-at-a-time response than a massive, exhausting (for me) rebuttal. However, that said, I do have a BS in Physics and would be very interested in your (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

impossible
(score: 1.096)

  Re: Chicago Legofest - UPDATE
 
(...) I am (...) parents (...) 10 (...) friend to (...) FF7 (...) PPL (...) have (...) me....Kamauzinama@aol.com That wouldn't be impossible for me, but improbable. And impossible probably for the people in WI. Chris Leach is planning on coming - (...) (24 years ago, 3-Aug-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.us.il, lugnet.loc.us.wi, lugnet.loc.us.mi, lugnet.loc.us.in, lugnet.org.us.gmlug)
 

impossible
(score: 1.096)

  Re: mmu
 
It's not impossible. The easiest way is to use the same technique as Java (or IC) and write an embedded interpreter that executes code for a "psuedo" machine. The resulting machine can have arbitrarily strict access restrictions between tasks. You (...) (26 years ago, 11-Aug-98, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
 

impossible
(score: 1.096)

  Re: Evolution - Impossible!
 
(...) Jon, if I go through this whole article point by point (which is well-informed, if wilfully misleading), and show how evolutionary theory can account for all the "discrepancies" it points out will you actually change your mind, or at least (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

impossible
(score: 1.096)

  Re: Evolution - Impossible!
 
(...) Me too!! Fortunately, I think most of the rebuttal can be concentrated in two or three points. (...) BSc in biology for me, and ditto on open-mindedness and time constraints. I'll get on to this next week sometime -- have a good weekend! (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

impossible
(score: 1.096)

  Re: Evolution - Impossible!
 
(...) Really Bad Pseudo-Science designed to sway public opinion, not pass scientific inspection. Sophistry taken to a new level. Bruce (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

impossible
(score: 1.096)

  Re: Evolution - Impossible!
 
(...) I guess that's the best I can expect? Surely you can do better than name-calling - how about some specific refutation. If you won't or can't - you've closed your mind and further discussion will probably be futile. -Jon (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

impossible
(score: 1.096)

  Re: Evolution - Impossible!
 
(...) That's funny: I (and Bruce, I expect) have been thinking the same thing about the creationists in this debate. Dave! (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

impossible
(score: 1.096)

  Re: Evolution - Impossible!
 
(...) Dave mentioned elsewhere that he is preparing some kind of response to this, so I am defering to him at the moment rather than duplicate effort. To cover it all would take quite a bit of effort. Tell you what, though, show me where he got any (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

impossible
(score: 1.096)

  Re: Evolution - Impossible!
 
(...) Nice - you want me to defend him. I'm not attacking him. (!) Why don't you try and dispute any of it? I won't be so foolish to claim that it's perfect, only that I probably agree with most of it. Defer to Dave if you will. -Jon (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

impossible
(score: 1.096)

  Re: Evolution - Impossible!
 
(...) No - I just want you to provide some evidence for your claims, which you refuse to do. I'm afraid we are fast approaching the, "A non-answer IS an answer" stage (i.e. you don't answer because you can't). (...) Didn't say you were. (...) What (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

impossible
(score: 1.096)

  Re: Evolution - Impossible!
 
(...) The article has evidence enough, shall I quote it? (rhetorical) (...) I toyed with posting the article in it's entirety :-) But I'll simply say this: I'll be happy to defend anything in it. -Jon (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

impossible
(score: 1.096)

  Re: Evolution - Impossible!
 
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jon Kozan writes: you can't). (...) I gave you essentially two options and I'd respond to either: point out where any parts of the article were published in a reputable scientific journal and I'd respond to those, or tell (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

impossible
(score: 1.096)

More:  Next Page >>


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR