 | | Re: Thoughts on 1999 sets
|
|
(...) I agree. Before I saw the "Technic" label on these pictures, I thought they looked like the Znap pictures I have seen as well. Sarah Heacock (27 years ago, 31-Oct-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Scans Ready: Star Wars, Rock Raiders, and other 1999 sets.
|
|
(...) I doubt it. Those 1 page ads NEVER have All the sets for a theme in them. Just some highlights (and if I remember, some current sets don't even appear on the product catalogs in their own sets.) (...) multi-colored parrot? It looks red to me! (...) (27 years ago, 31-Oct-98, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Use Lugnet for Bay Area LEGO Mailing List?
|
|
(...) Russel Clark and I are working out the details of a message-exchange for ba-lego@cinnamon.com and lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf@lugnet.com -- so that messages posted to one would automatically show up in the other, thus "joining" the ba-lego mailing (...) (27 years ago, 31-Oct-98, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGnet historical moment -- (was: Got 1999 mini catalog!)
|
|
I always tend to like things from Todd, since I first saw the fibblesnork (uhm, maybe except extremely long delivery times of Auczilla...:-) Lugnet is just nice, and thanks for it, to everybody who contributes. Selçuk (...) (27 years ago, 31-Oct-98, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Scans Ready: Star Wars, Rock Raiders, and other 1999 sets.
|
|
(...) This isn't really about Star Wars OR the Web page anymore so I've cut the cross-posting down to lugnet.general only. Wouldn't the body function-related word be TURD? Totally Unneeded R<...> D<...> Sarah (27 years ago, 31-Oct-98, to lugnet.general)
|
