|
| | subassemblies
|
| I just took apart my latest creation and realized that I didn't want to take part some sections. I've often kept certain sub-parts and many copies of the same assemblies. When I build something new I can reach for a solution just by rummaging (...) (25 years ago, 5-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic)
| | | | Re: Review 7124 - Flash Speeder
|
| (...) I'd deny that set name. <ducks and runs> (...) The Excellent: My fav element (6091) in quantity in *green*{:^D (...) Good review. Thanks, Eric:-) -John (...) (25 years ago, 5-Jan-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | Re: John E. Doolittle
|
| Bruce Schlickbernd wrote (...) Yeah. Cool, isn't it. (...) I'm writing as fast as I can, but my y2k compliant quill isn't made for this kind of high pressure work. I'll try to knock it out late tonight :-) So far so good, no-one seems to have (...) (25 years ago, 5-Jan-00, to lugnet.pirates)
| | | | Re: Speed of RCX interpreting bytecodes: slow
|
| (...) Hmm. If so, an interesting option for a theoretical replacement-but- compatible firmware to have would be the ability to do things as fast as possible. (Of course, it'd have to be an option, since it's possible that some badly-designed code (...) (25 years ago, 5-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| | | | Re: Other Vermonters
|
| Hi Matt, I'm mostly a robotics fan, not too much into the non-Mindstorms, non-Technic LEGO. If anyone else chimes in here, maybe we can consider a local get-together sometime. Rumor has it there are at least 4 of us in NELUG and maybe there's more (...) (25 years ago, 5-Jan-00, to lugnet.loc.us.vt.bur)
|
Skipped 3 messages in
group
lugnet.off-topic.debate (Skip-filter settings)
|