 | | Re: Why etoys.com's toys for tots list has no Lego?
|
|
(...) I noticed this as well, think there's a place we could talk to etoys about it? or perhaps pay full price for a set and have them donate it, rather than their sucky sets? (I admit, i didn't look for this option) =-= =-= =-= =-= =-= =-= =-= =-= (...) (25 years ago, 3-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Why etoys.com's toys for tots list has no Lego?
|
|
Am I the only one who noticed this? That sucks. I'm planning on donating some Lego sets locally ANYway (and getting free cable installation at my new apartment while I'm at it) but I certainly wouldn't mind zapping off a few more online if I could. (...) (25 years ago, 3-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I've tried
|
|
(...) Just to make sure you're using the right compiler version, do the following: nqc >output.txt then post (or e-mail me) the contents of output.txt Also, see if it compiles the test.nqc program included in the distribution. Dave Baum (25 years ago, 3-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Hovertank (repost) [DAT]
|
|
Here is a model I posted some time ago and didn't work. Hope it does this time and if it doesn't sorry. Mladen Pejic, over an out! 1 0 -100 -8 40 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3033.DAT 1 0 20 -8 90 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3023.DAT 1 0 20 -8 -10 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 (...) (25 years ago, 3-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: converting Mac to PC and the Lego remote
|
|
(...) The problems you are seeing are differences between version 1.x and 2.x of the NQC language (not Mac/PC differences). Here are a few differences between 1.x and 2.x. This is by no means a comprehensive list, but it should at least allow you to (...) (25 years ago, 3-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
