To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  *71500 (-5)
  no BURPs?
 
It just occured to me that I hadn't seen any BURPs in the new catalogue, so I went back and looked closer - no BURPs in the new sets. Lots of SPUDs and POOPs, but nary a single BURP! Is this indicative? James (URL) (26 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: BEWARE of John DiRienzo
 
(...) Ditto again. Of the several times I've dealt with John, he's only been late once, although he *can* be very hard to get a hold of via e-mail. There must be some other factor here. James (URL) (26 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
 
  Re: took another look at the 2000 catalog...
 
(...) The piece in this set: (URL) ... ? If so, then go get your hands on it right now;) -- pn (26 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.castle)
 
  Re: MF Goofup?
 
Shaun Sullivan <sullis3@mit.edu> wrote in message news:38285805.10E088...mit.edu... (...) See my earlier post--I think they are hiding something. The MF probably looks even worse when you can see between the top front mandible and the hull piece. (...) (26 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: MF Goofup?
 
(...) I think you're right! If only they had a Chewie minifig - he'd never have let that slip. Richard (26 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)

Skipped 1 message in group lugnet.off-topic.geek (Skip-filter settings)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR