 | | Re: 2000 Scans are Online!
|
|
(...) Hmm... no I didn't. I don't think they've ever done 16 or above before! Wow. :) Finally some recognition of older LEGO fans. Um, expesive, LOTS of pieces. Hmmm... Kevin posted a close up of the Falcon (not from the page I wanted, but good (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2000 Scans are Online!
|
|
I just added c00am-12a.jpg, a 300dpi close up of the MF It doesn't exactly fit on the page like the rest of the scans, but oh well. KL (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Making Fake Pieces?
|
|
(...) Another fan of large projects (and there are quite a few these days :) As a LEGO purist I cannot condone the mutilation of LEGO parts in model construction, but it is your LEGO, and farbeit for me to tell you what to do with it. I can offer (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Millennium Falcon close-up! (was: Re: Sorry to spoil it KL, but 2000 catalog posted!)
|
|
(...) There's a big closeup on page 12! (URL) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: 2000 Scans are Online!
|
|
Jason Brown wrote in message <382739DC.77E70887@m...es.edu>... (...) :) Anyway, (...) Did you notice the age on the "Ultimate Collector's Series" from 16 years? Has Lego listed an age 16 or above? They look expensive to me... (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
