 | | Re: New angled beam
|
|
(...) You're quite right about that part. I belive it has number 32139. (You can see the number molded into it if you study it carefully. (...) Perhaps you can do without the gear boxes if you use the new style geared motors? Anyway, gear boxes come (...) (27 years ago, 2-Oct-99, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | 6285 currently at only 75$ ! ! !
|
|
(...) Starting bid 48$ by Andrew (...) Bid now 75$ by Troy (...) (27 years ago, 2-Oct-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| |
| | Re: Space Station/Base Names (was Re: Space stations?)
|
|
(...) of (...) That sounds fast enough to me! I mean, on a bad morning, some people get a headache *walking* from the bedroom to the bathroom! It all comes down to distance and time (doh!). The further apart the installations, the faster we need to (...) (27 years ago, 2-Oct-99, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Space Station/Base Names (was Re: Space stations?)
|
|
(...) wants (...) I'll (...) Very funny! 8-) (...) I think the centre of the galaxy would be a good idea, if only as it will simplify the Maths! If we said that Earth was (0,0,0) then the x,y and z axes would be moving all the time. For one season (...) (27 years ago, 2-Oct-99, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Is Classic Space really that fantastic?
|
|
Tobias Möller wrote in message ... (...) I think one of the main things about Classic Space is that new models were brought out in the same range each year, and you could buy this year's new models and put them easily alongside last year's. (...) (27 years ago, 1-Oct-99, to lugnet.space)
|
