|
|
 | | Re: New angled beam
|
| (...) It's not 45° or even 135° (as you probably meant). Rather, it has the same angle as the original one bend beam (6629), that is 143.13°. This is according to Huw Millington, who has the part in questions himself. (...) In LDraw, we call these (...) (25 years ago, 29-Sep-99, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: New angled beam
|
| Fredrik Glöckner wrote in message ... (...) Sorry. i meant to say that the R2-D2 piece Fredrik originally meant was not *90* degrees, but about 45 degrees. It's not the liftarm but a one-bend beam, shorter version than before. Meanwhile this also (...) (25 years ago, 29-Sep-99, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: LEGO Stereogram (see it in 3D!)
|
| Matthew Miller wrote in message ... (...) Note: Bigger makes it harder (or impossible) to look at with parallel eyes. (In this case the object could be pictured larger in the same space though.) Eric Brok (25 years ago, 29-Sep-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
| | | | | Ok, I'll post the first message.
|
| Who has the longest train? I have the loco (toot toot) and 12 carriages. (25 years ago, 29-Sep-99, to lugnet.primo)
| | | | | Re: Its quiet in here...
|
| (...) Maybe its like cornflakes : "contents may settle in transit" ? (25 years ago, 29-Sep-99, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
Skipped 1 message in
group
lugnet.admin.general (Skip-filter settings)
|
