 | | Re: Well this gives a new meaning to Spam...
|
|
(...) That's probably not a good response. It just adds to the problem, and irritates the admins of both your site and theirs. Instead, examine the headers carefully and e-mail the abuse addresses at all of the sites involved, including the headers (...) (25 years ago, 27-Sep-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Stereogram (see it in 3D!)
|
|
(...) Seriously, does anyone know if astigmatism can affect the results of these images? It's like those pictures that were all the rage at the malls a few years back. I'm of the opinion that stuffing LSD into the frame might be a key factor of (...) (25 years ago, 27-Sep-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego at Gerf.Org
|
|
That last message should have had Followup-To set to lugnet.publish. Sorry. (25 years ago, 27-Sep-99, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: RIS 1.5
|
|
(...) Maybe they are referring to the new (?) connectors that come in the Robotics Discovery Set. The RDS comes with a kind of 3-stud friction pin that I've never seen before. It's like the normal black Technic 3-stud friction pin except that one (...) (25 years ago, 27-Sep-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego at Gerf.Org
|
|
In lugnet.publish, Matthew Miller writes: <snipped debate about technicalities of internet addresses> (...) You're (the plural you) picking nits. If you re-read the specific entry in the fairplay document(1) it clearly states: "The LEGO Trademark (...) (25 years ago, 27-Sep-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
