|
|
 | | Re: **Bad Trader??**
|
| (...) Assuming there is a Todd. The LUGNET Creationist Theory was all well and fine up until the last twelve months or so, but come on! The evidence is overwhelming that selective adaptation gave us LUGNET, not some creation invoked by some sentient (...) (25 years ago, 22-Sep-99, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: New angled beam
|
| (...) If that angle is there to allow for some fit to a grid of holes, I'd guess the new beam has the same angle. In the US S@H catalog, alt. model pictures show that the new beam, too, has 9 holes, albeit 2+corner+6 rather than 3+corner+5. I've (...) (25 years ago, 22-Sep-99, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: Town 2000?
|
| (...) the "big head" cowboys. Looks pretty funny. Gary Istok (25 years ago, 22-Sep-99, to lugnet.town)
| | | | | NQC 2.0 and some math questions
|
| Dave, You state in your documentation that * / and % can be used on constants only, but your example has x * Y in it. What is it that you mean? Does this mean that one can only do a y = 5*4 using these math routines? Does this mean that, for (...) (25 years ago, 22-Sep-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | | Re: Town 2000?
|
| (...) Or go back to 1975 and check out set 365 (Wild West Scene). Looks like the WW prototype. Gary Istok (25 years ago, 22-Sep-99, to lugnet.town)
|
|
