 | | Re: DAT format question
|
|
Bram Lambrecht wrote in message <19990921.200045.509...no.com>... (...) My experience has been that as flexibility increases, complexity increases. I'm usually quite anal about coding objects to always behave in a very structured, predictable (...) (27 years ago, 22-Sep-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | FA(eBay): 2100+ all-new Technic parts
|
|
4 sets clear engine cylinder, yellow piston and connectors, plus extra connectors (URL) Technic connectors of many kinds (URL) Technic figures plus 5 helmets with visors (URL) standard black Technic beams, 1x16 to 1x2 (incl 2-hole 1x2) (URL) Black (...) (27 years ago, 22-Sep-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| |
| | Re: DAT format question
|
|
(...) Why not? I've done this when a part didn't exist (I used a box.dat for the center of the 1x2x2 shock absorber) (...) Part developers often use different colors to make sure shapes are matching up correctly. Also, atterned parts and some other (...) (27 years ago, 22-Sep-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Will buy 6396
|
|
(...) Could you email me your analysis of why the IJ is the worst of the three airports? (27 years ago, 22-Sep-99, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| |
| | Re: DAT format question
|
|
(...) Probably too restrictive. Most (I think) part developers design their parts in the models directory to keep them separate from the official parts. Mock-ups and crude outlines of parts should also be kept out of the parts directory. I like the (...) (27 years ago, 22-Sep-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
