To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  *59430 (-5)
  Re: Box Progress [Technic #1]
 
The Technic Box #1 has left my house and is presently on its way to Paul Sinasohn. as evah, John C. (27 years ago, 20-Sep-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
 
  RE: The Scout vs. the RCX
 
I'm not sure I agree.... The Scout has functionality built in that isn't well expressed in this release. If I were cynical, I might think that Lego was positioning a new toy for this Christmas, and a software update for next ;>) The Scout will (...) (27 years ago, 20-Sep-99, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  small !!!4.5v!!! Train Accessory Elements auction
 
CORRECTION!!! They are indeed 4.5v OOOPS! At closer inspection the 4.5v is molded in to the light brick! That's what happens when a 9v'er plays with older trains! SteveB (...) (27 years ago, 20-Sep-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
 
  Re: Do either of these parts exist?
 
(...) If I'm not dreaming, either 8250 or 8277 (or both) have several (well, if it was 8250, it oculd be just a couple) 1x1 grey tiles. Of course those are pretty large sets just to get a few small bits from. (27 years ago, 20-Sep-99, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: Review: 8286 3-in-1 car
 
(...) Good review. You were right on in your assessment of the mechanicals and building of the set--it's not at all complicated mechanically, but it shows the builder a *lot* of different building techniques. Steve (27 years ago, 20-Sep-99, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.reviews)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR