| | Re: Mathematical proof that you can't build anything with LEGO bricks
|
|
(...) I think it's the higher ratio of piece types to set size that leads him to conclude the sets are not as useful for free-form building as they once were. The argument he makes is that if you have a set of 100 unique pieces, it has less (...) (13 years ago, 1-Mar-12, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: Mathematical proof that you can't build anything with LEGO bricks
|
|
(...) I've been sort of pondering this, and I've concluded that the researcher's conclusion makes more sense if we use as a sample 100 random elements chosen from the "classic" LEGO era vs 100 random elements from the newer Ninjago era. Whatever the (...) (13 years ago, 29-Feb-12, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: need help identifying set
|
|
(...) DaveE (13 years ago, 29-Feb-12, to lugnet.town, lugnet.general, FTX)
|
|
| | need help identifying set
|
|
i need help identifying/finding a set. i seem to remember a town/flight set that included a black airplane that had an odd double-tail fin design very much like the 6582 daredevil flight squad plane ((URL) seems like it was available in the early (...) (13 years ago, 29-Feb-12, to lugnet.town, lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: Mathematical proof that you can't build anything with LEGO bricks
|
|
(...) Me too. I love the little details like the frowny face next to the age range, and that the set number is the Number of the Beast. (13 years ago, 29-Feb-12, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|