 | | Re: Why quads? Re: L(EGO)Draw parts - 4th batch
|
|
(...) Good question! + reduces file size by 50% + 50% less vertices to adjust when building "by hand" + triangles plays havoc with smooth shading (the helical artefact that can be seen here (URL) disappears when triangles are converted to quads. But (...) (14 years ago, 17-Sep-10, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Investment for a home layout?
|
|
(...) Build your own? Do you have any url's handy? (14 years ago, 17-Sep-10, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 8258 crane truck back on the US shop at home site
|
|
Are you saying that they still have this model? (14 years ago, 17-Sep-10, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.market.shopping)
|
| |
| | Re: Investment for a home layout?
|
|
(...) Whoops... missed that bit. All indications are that LEGO will be using the RC track for a long time and they seem very committed to PFS in trains too and have invited various AFOLs to help out with it. I'd be very surprised if this system (...) (14 years ago, 17-Sep-10, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Advice on hair pieces
|
|
(...) I noticed the 4th-batch part I worked on had a significantly better format. That must be why. It was missing some edge lines, but Edger took care of that handily. (...) Heh, I would've thought my idea of a utility was more radical. I'm not (...) (14 years ago, 17-Sep-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
