|
|
 | | Re: LDDP Coplaner Checks
|
| (...) Heartfully agree! Philo (15 years ago, 16-Jun-09, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Re: LDDP Coplaner Checks
|
| (...) Hi Orion, short answer: No, move them out. Don't create confusion with different tests and stick to the specs. w. (15 years ago, 16-Jun-09, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Re: LDraw LEGO Ambassadors: Call for nominations
|
| (...) Hi Tim, looks like the job is yours. w. (15 years ago, 16-Jun-09, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: LDraw LEGO Ambassadors: Call for nominations
|
| (...) Hi Tim, thx for the nomination but regretfully I'm going to decline. I do not believe that one person should occupy too many chairs within the community: "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost (...) (15 years ago, 16-Jun-09, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | LDDP Coplaner Checks
|
| Now that the coplaner quad is defined in the LDraw spec by planer normals, the dist and det checks used by LDDP (and L3P) are now outdated. I think these checks should be removed, are there any users out there that would like to see them stay? (...) (15 years ago, 16-Jun-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
|
