 | | Re: naming for some half-primitives
|
|
(...) I see. I shall use those, then. (16 years ago, 26-Jan-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Robolab and Spybotics
|
|
(...) I don't know if RoboLab will work with Spybotics, but if you have prior programming experience NQC may be a better option. It works great with Spybotics. Jetro (16 years ago, 26-Jan-09, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab, lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
| |
| | Robolab and Spybotics
|
|
Does anyone have any experience using Robolab with a Spybotics kit? I just got a couple of old Spybotics kits for my son this past Christmas and would love to program them with him using Robolab. I have lots of programming experience, although I am (...) (16 years ago, 26-Jan-09, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab, lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
| |
| | Re: naming for some half-primitives
|
|
(...) Please just use the next available axlehoXX and npegholX numbers; axleho10.dat (thats one-zero not ell-zero), npeghol8.dat and npeghol9.dat. I want to sort out a better naming convention for these, but I don't want to hold up creativity. Chris (...) (16 years ago, 26-Jan-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | naming for some half-primitives
|
|
I've got a little little problem with primitives. I'm working on the 61808.dat file (I guess I'll do it with 61811.dat parallel...), and to ease it up and to save disk space the file will be in four quarters. So, to have such things, you inevitably (...) (16 years ago, 26-Jan-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
