 | | Re: Fire Skull - an armored dragon
|
|
(...) Hi Tim, I also found it got very calm around here. I remember the days when .mecha was one of the top traffic groups on Lugnet. Don't get me wrong, I'm talking of the times when traffic was produced by MoC replies not flame wars. Well those (...) (17 years ago, 18-May-08, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Fire Skull - an armored dragon
|
|
(...) Hello Eric, thank you very much for this compliment! A set developed on a MoC from me ¬ would really be something I'd be proud off. Cheers Sandro (Cheers Marco, the proud dad, who did the translation) (17 years ago, 18-May-08, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Magnet and coupler statement.
|
|
(...) i imagine those parts will be redesigned as well. imagine a 2x2 plate with a two plate high cylinder on top. i imagine it will look something like that if they do infact redesign it. on another mildly related note, the redesigned buffers may (...) (17 years ago, 18-May-08, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Magnet and coupler statement.
|
|
The Natasha ... ah that brings back memories ... The magnet holders in the Natasha are small pieces: (URL) are the ones used in the current trains: (URL) with the trains the magnets were always part of the buffer assembly, so coming up with a (...) (17 years ago, 17-May-08, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Magnet and coupler statement.
|
|
I think the crux of this notice is the 'magnets in small parts'. So they will keep selling magnets, but the piece that contains the magnet must be above a certain size (standard non-swallowing size, presumably). How small are the magnet-holding (...) (17 years ago, 17-May-08, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
