To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  *55927 (-5)
  Re: MSIE5 security hole
 
(...) I wonder why so many people have a hard time telling I'm being sarcastic and so many others don't? I think most people get it IRL. In fact, I know they do. :) (27 years ago, 3-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish)
 
  Re: MSIE5 security hole
 
(...) Nobody? Tell that to all the people who made a killing with the RedHat IPO. (27 years ago, 3-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish)
 
  Re: MSIE5 security hole
 
(...) Heh. You're not disagreeing with what I meant, just what I said. I think Communicator 4.5 on is a pile of garbage. If I ever see another stupid bug report window pop up within 30 seconds of running their stupid product I'll never bother trying (...) (27 years ago, 3-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish)
 
  Re: lurkers
 
Paul Foster wrote: What states would we consider Great Lakes (...) GM includes all those plus IA and ON. GMLUG, GMLTC. has a nice ring to it. (27 years ago, 3-Sep-99, to lugnet.loc.us.wi, lugnet.loc.us.il, lugnet.loc.us.mn, lugnet.loc.us.mi, lugnet.loc.us.in)
 
  Re: MSIE5 security hole
 
(...) Which UTK PCs? If you mean the ones in the labs they most certainly do not have IE5 on them, nor will they have it anytime real soon. I like IE5 alot, and I get pretty freakin tired of all the stupid potshots people take at it and MS without (...) (27 years ago, 3-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR