 | | Re: Opinions sought on rendering method
|
|
(...) OK, I played around with this tonight for a few hours, and finally came up with something that I think I'm happy with. It requires 3 passes of the transparent polygons (just during snapshot save with SaveAlpha enabled), but it seems to get (...) (19 years ago, 9-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Future of Trains
|
|
(...) You are right, the main limitation probably comes from wall wart... You are essentially right for the 0.7A current (though it is not hard limit, rather a safety one). Philo (19 years ago, 9-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.robotics.nxt, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Opinions sought on rendering method
|
|
(...) To me, the reasons are mainly "historical": the first way to get better images than the output of Ldraw/MLCad/LeoCAD (which is not that bad for instructions!) was POV-Ray. L3PAO then LPub did a lot to push POV as the renderer of choice. Add to (...) (19 years ago, 9-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: What would YOU like to see from TECHNIC?
|
|
Here are a few of my ideas: robotic arm (advanced version of set #8094) carnival rides (set #4957 is a good start) areal cable car (similar to the one in idea book #8889) remote controlled hovercraft (could be moving around on wheels) airplane with (...) (19 years ago, 9-Oct-07, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Opinions sought on rendering method
|
|
(...) A very important point - I didn't even noticed that the vehicle roof was grey, not white! (...) That's the main problem of LDD generated instructions: no edges... Philo (19 years ago, 9-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)
|
