|
|
 | | Re: The Future of Trains
|
| (...) Hey Harvey, I think you missed the point in the original post by Steve. The next "Train" will have motors as well. What we do not know is if the motors will fit in existing locomotive designs allowing the trains to look realistic. If the new (...) (18 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
|
| (...) Oooo! Thanks for mentioning this. I had forgotten about it, as if I never knew it. After messing around, I (manually) got the image for 58119.dat straightened out (URL) But I haven't convinced the script that it should run this way. Yet. If (...) (18 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Re: The Future of Trains
|
| (...) *coughBIONICLEcough* Ok, granted, it rarely involves face-to-face interaction on the same level as more AFOL-friendly themes, but it still counts. (18 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | Re: The Future of Trains
|
| (...) More accurately, Li-Ion batteries, _unlike_ most other battery types, do age. NiCads wear out through use, or through improper partial charging, and have a moderate shelf discharge (depleting the charge while just sitting unused). NiMHs wear (...) (18 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | Re: The Future of Trains
|
| (...) Steve, Pardon me for saying so, but your statement above is a little confusing. How was the conversion from 12v to 9v a "ground up" switch. The 12v trains I have run on the 9v track. The 9v trains I have run on the 12v track I have (well they (...) (18 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
|
|
