|
|
 | | Re: The Future of Trains
|
| (...) It does not make sense in strictly monetary terms for TLG to continue to produce a line that is not directly profitable. However, we have raised the point before that numerous intangible benefits arise from the 9V Train line. Community (...) (18 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.trains) !
| | | | | Re: Call for Nominations: 2007/2008 LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC)
|
| (...) And needless to say, I accept ;-) (18 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: Call for Nominations: 2007/2008 LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC)
|
| I, William Howard, nominate myself (parts author and parts reviewer) (18 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: Call for Nominations: 2007/2008 LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC)
|
| I, William Howard, nominate Lars C. Hassing (software author, parts author and parts reviewer) (18 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: The Future of Trains
|
| (...) The current IR trains will remain in the assortment for the time being. They will eventually be replaced by the new Power Function System as well. Steve (18 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
|
|
