|
|
 | | Re: The Future of Trains
|
| (...) The truth is finally revealed (...) No matter how much 'AFOL input' there is, it will be the decision of the company in the end (of course) (...) Exclusively plastic track means reliance on batteries, there is no other way around it. And the (...) (18 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | LDMerge 1.0
|
| LDMerge is a console tool for managing multiple LDraw part libraries. It permits the contents of one or more library to be merged into another library and subsequently unmerged with minimum hassle. (URL) works with Mac OS X, Windows, and other (...) (18 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Re: The Future of Trains
|
| (...) Good question for those, like me, without much of a train collection (yet). I guess I could be considered "lucky" that I don't have the investment in track and accessories but I cannot even do much more than a really big oval with what I have. (...) (18 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: The Future of Trains
|
| Well I posted this announcement at the (URL) site... Personally, I have to say that I have doubts that any battery powered system will meet the needs of clubs doing shows. Even a robust, rechargable battery system has considerable limitations. (...) (18 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
|
| Hello Steve, (...) Any news about this? I have submitted a new part with the same color scheme ((URL) problem remains :-( Philo (18 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
|
