 | | Re: The Official "Issues List"
|
|
(...) Unbelievable! Truly unbelievable! What about saving 9 volt trains? Why isn't that the number 1 issue? Why isn't it on the list AT ALL? Over the past two years many of us have been lobbying this point with every LEGO employee we meet, from (...) (17 years ago, 27-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Official "Issues List"
|
|
(...) I feel that publicising leaks is most definitely in TLGs best interests. If we can find stuff then it means their competitors can do the same if they're interested. Security by obsfucation has never been successful and is unlikely to ever be (...) (17 years ago, 27-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Official "Issues List"
|
|
(...) To answer your question: Leaks are an issue that TLG is concerned about. The Ambassadors also felt that this should be listed as an issue in the best interest of their business, as well as for the fans. As Lenny pointed out in another thread, (...) (17 years ago, 27-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Official "Issues List"
|
|
10) Continual information leaks on upcoming LEGO sets/themes. (Corporate Security) Is this something TLG is concerned about or something AFOLs are concerned about? Personally, I'll take all the information (leaked or otherwise) I can get. Marc (...) (17 years ago, 27-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Official "Issues List"
|
|
(...) Please, let's not turn this thread into a "Wish List", okay? (We all have those.) Instead, please focus on our listed "issues", or suggest something that was not covered in the list - especially anything that impacts very large groups of (or (...) (17 years ago, 27-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Official "Issues List"
|
|
(...) I wish they would go back to the days when the picture on the box was an actual photograph of the set and not a computer rendering at all. (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors)
|
| |
| | Re: Alternate NXT-Firmware flashing tools
|
|
(...) ReHi Jürgen, yes this is a trivial job, but what should I learn from this packets ? fwflash returns no error back to commandline ... Does this mean fwflash works blindly and returns no protocol or packet errors ? Why is the result "success" (...) (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt.nxthacking)
|
| |
| | Re: MOCpages? Brickshelf? What should I do?
|
|
(...) Is this true? Didn't Tim Courtney establish the LDRAW committee in 1999, well after (and due to) James Jessiman's passing in 1997? Furthermore, James was developing an open standard, he wasn't providing a service or a selling a product. These (...) (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Ambassadors Status Report - Summer 2007
|
|
(...) This is an interesting question about how representation should be spread. I believe that each fan should feel like they have access to an Ambassador to a reasonable degree. That is an ideal that, from cycle to cycle, we should move closer to. (...) (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Official "Issues List"
|
|
Thanks! Every little helps! God bless, Nathan (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
